Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: optimize RecipeMatcher.match performance#2222

Draft
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-recipe-matcher-10340542673770897753
Draft

⚡ Bolt: optimize RecipeMatcher.match performance#2222
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-recipe-matcher-10340542673770897753

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Optimized the RecipeMatcher.match method to reduce algorithmic complexity and overhead.
🎯 Why: The original implementation performed redundant sorting and expensive JSON.stringify calls for every recipe on every match attempt, leading to significant overhead in crafting systems.
📊 Impact: Expected performance improvement of ~20x for crafting matching. Benchmarks show a reduction from ~0.109ms to ~0.005ms per match.
🔬 Measurement: Verified with benchmark_final.ts (local scratchpad) and existing server/src/tests/crafting.test.ts unit tests.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 10340542673770897753 started by @OuroborosCollective

- Hoists input sorting outside the find loop.
- Implements O(1) length check fast-path.
- Caches sorted recipe inputs in a WeakMap to avoid redundant sorting and prevent object mutation.
- Replaces expensive JSON.stringify comparison with element-wise array comparison.

Performance impact: Reduces average match time from ~0.109ms to ~0.005ms (~21x speedup) in benchmarks with 100 recipes.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants