Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE] Add backwards compatibility test for real amplitude circuits#15898

Closed
gadial wants to merge 5 commits intoQiskit:mainfrom
gadial:qpy_reproduce_bug
Closed

[DO NOT MERGE] Add backwards compatibility test for real amplitude circuits#15898
gadial wants to merge 5 commits intoQiskit:mainfrom
gadial:qpy_reproduce_bug

Conversation

@gadial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gadial gadial commented Mar 29, 2026

Summary

This PR adds new test to the QPY backwards compatibility suite based on RealAmplitude circuits, as the 2.4 release candidates encountered errors with such circuits generated by old qiskit implementations which were not locally reproducible.

Details and comments

@gadial gadial requested a review from a team as a code owner March 29, 2026 11:40
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core
  • @mtreinish

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 23708733996

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 13 unchanged lines in 3 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 87.464%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/circuit/src/parameter/symbol_expr.rs 2 73.85%
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 5 92.8%
crates/qasm2/src/parse.rs 6 97.63%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 23707500226: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 104017
Relevant Lines: 118926

💛 - Coveralls

@gadial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gadial commented Mar 31, 2026

Done in #15900

@gadial gadial closed this Mar 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants