Open
Conversation
Author
|
@dayures I'm not sure if there is a motivation to create an ssl.Context if we are ultimately passing just one cert file. @syats might have a reason for that which I am not totally aware of. From my perspective, I think my solution seems simpler. However, I can see that in the future, even greater extensibility may be offered by allowing for an ssl.Context to be passed to urlopen by the user. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I don't see an easy way to add a custom ca cert for verifying your sparql requests. I made a simple change so that you can easily add a custom cert in your request.