CVE-2019-12379 and CVE-2015-7566

cves/kernel/CVE-2015-7566.yml

@@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ curated_instructions: |
   This will enable additional editorial checks on this file to make sure you
   fill everything out properly. If you are a student, we cannot accept your work
   as finished unless curated is properly updated.
-curation_level: 0
+curation_level: 2
 reported_instructions: |
   What date was the vulnerability reported to the security team? Look at the
   security bulletins and bug reports. It is not necessarily the same day that
   the CVE was created.  Leave blank if no date is given.
 
   Please enter your date in YYYY-MM-DD format.
-reported_date:
+reported_date: '2016-02-24'
 announced_instructions: |
   Was there a date that this vulnerability was announced to the world? You can
   find this in changelogs, blogs, bug reports, or perhaps the CVE date.
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ description_instructions: |
 
   Your target audience is people just like you before you took any course in
   security
-description:
+description: |
+  When using a USB device that lacks a bulk-out endpoint (what sends data from the host to the device), 
+  a NULL pointer error occurs. This causes the system to crash which can lead to more errors and corruption.
 bounty_instructions: |
   If you came across any indications that a bounty was paid out for this
   vulnerability, fill it out here. Or correct it if the information already here
@@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ bugs_instructions: |
     * Mentioned in mailing list discussions
     * References from NVD entry
     * Various other places
-bugs: []
+bugs: [1296466, 1297517]
 fixes_instructions: |
   Please put the commit hash in "commit" below.
 
@@ -84,14 +86,9 @@ fixes_instructions: |
 
   Place any notes you would like to make in the notes field.
 fixes:
-- commit:
-  note:
-- commit:
-  note:
 - commit: cb3232138e37129e88240a98a1d2aba2187ff57c
   note: |
-    Taken from NVD references list with Git commit. If you are
-    curating, please fact-check that this commit fixes the vulnerability and replace this comment with 'Manually confirmed'
+    Taken from NVD references list with Git commit. Manually confirmed.
 vcc_instructions: |
   The vulnerability-contributing commits.
 
@@ -106,7 +103,7 @@ vcc_instructions: |
   Place any notes you would like to make in the notes field.
 vccs:
 - commit: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
-  note: Discovered automatically by archeogit.
+  note: Discovered automatically by archeogit. Manually confirmed. This is the inital commit of the repo.
 upvotes_instructions: |
   For the first round, ignore this upvotes number.
 
@@ -129,10 +126,10 @@ unit_tested:
 
     For the fix_answer below, check if the fix for the vulnerability involves
     adding or improving an automated test to ensure this doesn't happen again.
-  code:
-  code_answer:
-  fix:
-  fix_answer:
+  code: False
+  code_answer: No unit tests
+  fix: False
+  fix_answer: No unit tests
 discovered:
   question: |
     How was this vulnerability discovered?
@@ -147,10 +144,10 @@ discovered:
 
     If there is no evidence as to how this vulnerability was found, then please
     explain where you looked.
-  answer:
-  automated:
-  contest:
-  developer:
+  answer: Ralf Spenneberg of OpenSource Security reported the issue. Does not specify how it was found.
+  automated: False
+  contest: False
+  developer: False
 autodiscoverable:
   instructions: |
     Is it plausible that a fully automated tool could have discovered
@@ -167,8 +164,8 @@ autodiscoverable:
 
     The answer field should be boolean. In answer_note, please explain
     why you come to that conclusion.
-  note:
-  answer:
+  note: You can brute force (or check physically) for this check if it was accounted for. 
+  answer: True
 specification:
   instructions: |
     Is there mention of a violation of a specification? For example, the POSIX
@@ -184,8 +181,8 @@ specification:
 
     The answer field should be boolean. In answer_note, please explain
     why you come to that conclusion.
-  note:
-  answer:
+  note: No mention of specifications.
+  answer: False
 subsystem:
   question: |
     What subsystems was the mistake in? These are WITHIN linux kernel
@@ -219,8 +216,9 @@ subsystem:
     e.g.
         name: ["subsystemA", "subsystemB"] # ok
         name: subsystemA # also ok
-  name:
-  note:
+  name: drivers
+  note: |
+    Specifically drivers/usb/serial/visor.c in clie_5_attach.
 interesting_commits:
   question: |
     Are there any interesting commits between your VCC(s) and fix(es)?
@@ -251,8 +249,8 @@ i18n:
     Answer should be true or false
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: False
+  note: No internationalization present
 sandbox:
   question: |
     Did this vulnerability violate a sandboxing feature that the system
@@ -266,8 +264,9 @@ sandbox:
     Answer should be true or false
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: True
+  note: |
+    An unprivileged user with physical access could trigger a kernel NULL-pointer dereference.
 ipc:
   question: |
     Did the feature that this vulnerability affected use inter-process
@@ -278,8 +277,10 @@ ipc:
     Answer must be true or false.
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: True
+  note: |
+    The error is concerning the bulk OUT endpoint of USB devices. When it attempts to communicate 
+    with a USB device without the endpoint it will cause a systen crash.
 discussion:
   question: |
     Was there any discussion surrounding this?
@@ -305,9 +306,10 @@ discussion:
 
     Put any links to disagreements you found in the notes section, or any other
     comment you want to make.
-  discussed_as_security:
-  any_discussion:
-  note:
+  discussed_as_security: False
+  any_discussion: True
+  note: |
+    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-7566
 vouch:
   question: |
     Was there any part of the fix that involved one person vouching for
@@ -320,8 +322,8 @@ vouch:
 
     Answer must be true or false.
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: True
+  note: Code was reviewed before it was committed.
 stacktrace:
   question: |
     Are there any stacktraces in the bug reports?
@@ -335,9 +337,9 @@ stacktrace:
     Answer must be true or false.
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  any_stacktraces:
-  stacktrace_with_fix:
-  note:
+  any_stacktraces: False
+  stacktrace_with_fix: False
+  note: Could not find any stacktraces
 forgotten_check:
   question: |
     Does the fix for the vulnerability involve adding a forgotten check?
@@ -356,8 +358,8 @@ forgotten_check:
     Answer must be true or false.
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: True
+  note: It was never checked to see if the USB device had a bulk OUT endpoint, which caused the errror.
 order_of_operations:
   question: |
     Does the fix for the vulnerability involve correcting an order of
@@ -369,8 +371,9 @@ order_of_operations:
     Answer must be true or false.
     Write a note about how you came to the conclusions you did, regardless of
     what your answer was.
-  answer:
-  note:
+  answer: False
+  note: |
+    No order of operations present.
 lessons:
   question: |
     Are there any common lessons we have learned from class that apply to this
@@ -387,37 +390,37 @@ lessons:
     If you think of another lesson we covered in class that applies here, feel
     free to give it a small name and add one in the same format as these.
   defense_in_depth:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   least_privilege:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   frameworks_are_optional:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   native_wrappers:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   distrust_input:
-    applies:
-    note:
+    applies: True
+    note: Because it was assumed that USB's would be formatted correctly it never accounted for the vulnerability.
   security_by_obscurity:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   serial_killer:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   environment_variables:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   secure_by_default:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   yagni:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
   complex_inputs:
-    applies:
+    applies: False
     note:
 mistakes:
   question: |
@@ -448,7 +451,10 @@ mistakes:
 
     Write a thoughtful entry here that people in the software engineering
     industry would find interesting.
-  answer:
+  answer: |
+    There were no checks to make sure that there was an endpoint to write to because it was potentionally assumed 
+    that all USB devices would be normal and working. This led the the error occuring when USb devices were inproperly 
+    formatted or purposefully tampered with.
 CWE_instructions: |
   Please go to http://cwe.mitre.org and find the most specific, appropriate CWE
   entry that describes your vulnerability. We recommend going to
@@ -464,7 +470,7 @@ CWE_instructions: |
     CWE: ["123", "456"] # this is ok
     CWE: [123, 456]     # also ok
     CWE: 123            # also ok
-CWE:
+CWE: 476
 CWE_note:
 nickname_instructions: |
   A catchy name for this vulnerability that would draw attention it.