Skip to content

DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding #516

Open
acrusage-iaik wants to merge 11 commits intoa-sit-plus:developfrom
acrusage-iaik:feature/2026/02/18-dcql-require-holder-binding-requirements
Open

DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding #516
acrusage-iaik wants to merge 11 commits intoa-sit-plus:developfrom
acrusage-iaik:feature/2026/02/18-dcql-require-holder-binding-requirements

Conversation

@acrusage-iaik
Copy link
Collaborator

@acrusage-iaik acrusage-iaik commented Feb 18, 2026

  • Refactoring of validation procedure to have more expressive types
  • Changing OpenId4VPRequestOptions to transports a presentation request instead of it being built from credentials and presentation mechanism

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

@nodh
Copy link
Member

nodh commented Feb 18, 2026

@codex review

@acrusage-iaik acrusage-iaik changed the title DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding DRAFT: DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding Feb 18, 2026
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 87e9407b6f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@acrusage-iaik acrusage-iaik changed the title DRAFT: DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding DCQL send raw VcJws when not requiring cryptographic holder binding Feb 18, 2026
@nodh nodh self-assigned this Feb 20, 2026
@nodh nodh added this to the 5.12.0 milestone Feb 20, 2026
Copy link
Member

@nodh nodh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like the new structure, it makes the code much more readable.

Copy link
Member

@nodh nodh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see above

@acrusage-iaik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

acrusage-iaik commented Feb 20, 2026

I really like the new structure, it makes the code much more readable.

This ranks among the highest honors for a software developer

Copy link
Member

@nodh nodh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Once we decide on the issue about Signed vs VpJws or VcJws (see comment) this is good to go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants