We're currently using a hackish mock approach to estimating coverage for our Numba implementations; however, this is cumbersome to use and extend. Let's take (another) look at the use of numba.config.DISABLE_JIT for these purposes.
For instance, instead of eval_python_only at
|
eval_python_only(fn_inputs, fn_outputs, inputs, mode=numba_mode) |
we would—ideally—have something the following:
from numba.tests.support import override_config
with override_config('DISABLE_JIT', True):
aesara_numba_fn(*inputs)
A change like that would need to be followed by some pytest runs with coverage enabled, and the results would need to indicate that coverage was obtained for the Python code produced for Numba by Aesara.
We're currently using a hackish
mockapproach to estimating coverage for our Numba implementations; however, this is cumbersome to use and extend. Let's take (another) look at the use ofnumba.config.DISABLE_JITfor these purposes.For instance, instead of
eval_python_onlyataesara/tests/link/numba/test_basic.py
Line 241 in 404e2d4
we would—ideally—have something the following:
A change like that would need to be followed by some
pytestruns with coverage enabled, and the results would need to indicate that coverage was obtained for the Python code produced for Numba by Aesara.