Improve estimator efficiency#1
Open
jsun31 wants to merge 3 commits intoalinasode:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Improve estimator efficiency
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey - I needed an implementation of the Hill estimator for work, Googled for it, and your repo came up. Thanks for the code!
I noticed the algorithm ran quite slow, and realized that there can be efficiency improvements:
The a lot of log values can be pre-computed and stored, and numpy opersations can be vectorized. Tested this on some data I had, timing went from ~1 minute to ~0.002 minutes.
Also made minor formatting changes / renamed some variables so the code is more readable.
Also minor bug fix: the original code was dividing by k - 1 instead of k compared to actual Hill estimator formula. (There is some minor error with the formula in the READ.me but I don't know how to edit the latex there, so leaving it as-is.)