Add GOscade to the Goroutines section.

[ognick]

GOscade is a minimalistic lifecycle orchestrator for Go services and components. It provides dependency graphs, startup sequencing, readiness coordination, and graceful shutdown. The library is lightweight, idiomatic, actively maintained, and fully documented.

Forge link: https://github.com/ognick/goscade
pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/ognick/goscade

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link: https://github.com/ognick/goscade
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
• goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/ognick/goscade/v2
• coverage service link: https://app.codecov.io/gh/ognick/goscade

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README to include goscade, a Go Goroutine orchestration tool, in the Goroutines section with its key features and capabilities.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A single entry for the goscade Go orchestration tool was added to the Goroutines section of README.md, describing its lifecycle management capabilities including dependency graphs, startup sequencing, and graceful shutdown features.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation Update README.md	Added goscade entry to Goroutines section with description of lifecycle orchestration features

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• phanirithvij
• bukarumar147

Poem

🐰 A new tool hops into sight,
Goscade dances left and right,
Goroutines in harmony align,
Orchestration so divine,
The README now shines so bright! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding GOscade to the Goroutines section of the README.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2698e59 and 23a401f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (3)

README.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

README.md: When modifying the Awesome list, keep categories with at least three entries
Descriptions in the Awesome list must end with a period
Avoid promotional copy; keep descriptions concise and neutral in the Awesome list
Do not remove existing list content unless removal is requested and justified

Files:

• README.md

**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Keep documentation in English

Files:

• README.md

{README.md,COVERAGE.md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Align rendered documentation (README.md, COVERAGE.md, etc.) with behavior changes in main.go or helper packages

Files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: quality

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

1356-1356: LGTM: entry is compliant and correctly placed.

• Alphabetical position is correct (between gollback and gowl).
• Description is concise, neutral, English, and ends with a period.
• Category already has many entries; no quota issues.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks

Required checks

✅ Repo: accessible, has go.mod and SemVer release
✅ pkg.go.dev: OK
✅ Go Report Card: OK (grade unknown)

Additional checks

✅ License: MIT
✅ Maturity: repo has 5+ months of history
✅ CI/CD: GitHub Actions workflows detected
✅ README: present
✅ Coverage: link accessible

These checks are automated and do not replace maintainer review. See CONTRIBUTING.md for full guidelines.

---

PR Diff Validation

Content checks

❌ README change: no changes to README.md detected

How to fix: Your PR should add or remove an entry in README.md.
Edit README.md following the format: - [project-name](url) - Short description.

---

Action needed: one or more content checks failed. Please review the contribution guidelines.

Automated diff validation — does not replace maintainer review.

[ognick]

Hi! @fyyhpyrvjb-lang @avelino
Just a gentle ping to check if anything else is needed from my side for this PR.
Happy to update or adjust if required. Thanks!

[ognick]

Hi maintainers, this PR has been open since November 2025, while many newer submissions have already been processed.

It is mergeable, the available checks pass, and CodeRabbit marked the entry as compliant and correctly placed. Could you please re-run the current quality-check workflow or let me know whether I should close and reopen/resubmit the PR using the latest template?

Thanks.

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can enable the Remediation agent and Qodo fixes findings in a dedicated fix PR

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Add goscade to the Goroutines section

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Add goscade to the Goroutines tools list in README.
• Document goscade as a lightweight lifecycle orchestrator for Go components.

High-Level Assessment

The PR’s approach (adding a single, alphabetically placed entry with a concise description) is the most appropriate for an awesome list update; no alternative implementation is warranted.

Files changed (1) +1 / -0

Documentation (1) +1 / -0

README.mdAdd goscade entry to Goroutines list +1/-0

Add goscade entry to Goroutines list

• Adds a new bullet under the Goroutines section linking to github.com/ognick/goscade with a short description of its lifecycle orchestration features (dependency graphs, startup sequencing, readiness coordination, graceful shutdown).

README.md

[qodo-code-review]

Qodo Fixer

No findings are available for this PR yet. Findings appear here once Qodo has reviewed the PR.