Add precursor mass/charge range columns to DDA template#796
Add precursor mass/charge range columns to DDA template#796jonasscheid wants to merge 1 commit intobigbio:devfrom
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
The link-check CI failure is pre-existing and unrelated to this PR. The three broken links are in files not touched by this PR:
|
|
@jonasscheid we don't have terms for that, but we do have them in PRIDE in this way:
Under file properties we do have also intervals for RT and others: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/pride/classes/http%253A%252F%252Fpurl.obolibrary.org%252Fobo%252FPRIDE_0000471?lang=en |
|
Ah! That is good to know! Is Would be good to extend this ontology also with I would include them all as Optional, since you definitely need to define this in you MS device method |
Summary
comment[precursor mass range]— precursor mass range for database search (e.g.,800:2500)comment[precursor charge range]— precursor charge range for database search (e.g.,1:3)sdrf-terms.tsvand the DDA templateREADME.adoc(HTML and AsciiDoc table sections)These values are commonly defined in MS acquisition methods and parsed directly into search engines. Adding them as optional DDA columns improves reproducibility and enables automated reanalysis workflows.
Closes #774 (point 3)