Skip to content

Conversation

@gitclonebrian
Copy link

@gitclonebrian gitclonebrian commented Nov 14, 2025

🎟️ Tracking

BRE-1333

📔 Objective

Adding permissions to token generation step to limit token scope per least privilege best practice.
Changes were tested:

  • manual workflow run was initiated from this branch
  • translations were downloaded
  • PR was generated here

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@gitclonebrian gitclonebrian requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 20:39
@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Claude finished @gitclonebrian's task —— View job


PR Review Complete

Tasks:

  • Review PR title and description
  • Read changed workflow file
  • Perform comprehensive code review
  • Create inline comments for findings
  • Post summary assessment

Summary

This PR implements least-privilege token scoping for the GitHub App token used in the Crowdin Pull workflow. The change is security-positive and follows best practices.

Findings: 0 major, 0 minor, 0 refactoring, 1 improvement, 0 inquiries

Finding 1 🎨: Consider adding permission comment for id-token

The job-level permissions include id-token: write (line 16), which is used for Azure OIDC authentication. While the newly scoped GitHub App token correctly limits its permissions, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining why id-token: write is needed at the job level for consistency with the documentation style you've established.

Example
permissions:
  contents: write        # for checking out the repository
  pull-requests: write   # for the GitHub App to create PRs
  id-token: write        # for Azure OIDC authentication

Assessment

Approve with optional improvement

The changes correctly implement least-privilege token scoping:

  • Token permissions are explicitly limited to only what's needed
  • Comments clearly document the purpose of each permission
  • Testing was performed and verified working
  • No security concerns introduced

The optional improvement (Finding 1) would enhance consistency but is not required.


@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.97%. Comparing base (0959284) to head (18f27a6).
⚠️ Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6171      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.89%   84.97%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         724      735      +11     
  Lines       52778    53087     +309     
  Branches     7672     7678       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        44807    45113     +306     
- Misses       5279     5291      +12     
+ Partials     2692     2683       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsc1737b11-db44-4607-91e5-3d3b58bdcd7b

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

vvolkgang
vvolkgang previously approved these changes Nov 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants