Conversation
| * mod.Load_Component_Shift_Fraction_Invested[prj, mod.period[tmp]] | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Janie115, I'm not sure this is right. I understand the fix above (only remove the fraction invested from the load before adding the shifted load), but the variable costs below seem like they should apply to the shifted profile only like it was before. For example, if we start with a profile of 10MW/10MW/10MW in three timepoints, we invest in 4 MW (fraction 0.4), then we would remove 10MW*0.4 in the three timepoints (the second component /positive power provision in the above power_provision_rule) and add, say, a profile of 2MW/8MW/2MW (the first component/Load_Component_Shift_Add_Load_MW variable/negative power provision in the above expression). In the variable cost expressions below, however, we would only consider the 2MW/8MW/2MW part, which is the actual "operations" of the load shift. Am I misunderstanding what you are trying to do? Perhaps you only want to apply variable cost the losses?
2 participants
No description provided.