Skip to content

update packages#67

Merged
yilmaztayfun merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
60-enhancement-add-opentelemetry-tracing-spans-to-distributed-event-bus-pipeline
May 18, 2026
Merged

update packages#67
yilmaztayfun merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
60-enhancement-add-opentelemetry-tracing-spans-to-distributed-event-bus-pipeline

Conversation

@yilmaztayfun

@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary by Sourcery

Update .NET SDK version and roll-forward policy and align CI workflows to use the new 10.0.2xx SDK line.

Build:

  • Bump global .NET SDK from 10.0.103 to 10.0.200 and change rollForward policy from latestFeature to latestPatch.

CI:

  • Align SonarQube check and NuGet publish workflows to use the 10.0.2xx .NET SDK series instead of 10.0.x.

@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun self-assigned this May 18, 2026
@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun requested review from a team May 18, 2026 09:26
@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updates the .NET SDK version and roll-forward policy across configuration files and CI workflows to target the 10.0.200 SDK line with patch-level roll-forward, and aligns GitHub workflows with the same SDK band.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Align .NET SDK configuration with 10.0.200 and restrict roll-forward to patch versions.
  • Bumped sdk.version from 10.0.103 to 10.0.200 in global.json
  • Changed rollForward policy from latestFeature to latestPatch in global.json
global.json
Update CI workflows to use the 10.0.2xx SDK band for build and SonarQube checks.
  • Adjusted dotnet-version in check-sonar workflow from 10.0.x to 10.0.2xx to match the new SDK band
  • Adjusted dotnet-version in publish-nuget workflow from 10.0.x to 10.0.2xx to match the new SDK band
.github/workflows/check-sonar.yml
.github/workflows/publish-nuget.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun merged commit 4763f12 into master May 18, 2026
3 of 6 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@yilmaztayfun has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 160f4fe4-32ba-42ec-ae64-4309e503e38b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29511af and ab37170.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/check-sonar.yml
  • .github/workflows/publish-nuget.yml
  • Directory.Packages.props
  • global.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch 60-enhancement-add-opentelemetry-tracing-spans-to-distributed-event-bus-pipeline

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric Results
Complexity 0
Duplication 0

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • Consider confirming that narrowing rollForward from latestFeature to latestPatch won’t prevent the app from running on future minor SDK updates that might be available in your deployment environments.
  • Aligning the workflow dotnet-version with global.json is good; it may be worth explicitly documenting (in code comments or variable names) that 10.0.2xx is intentionally tied to the 10.0.200 SDK to avoid confusion when bumping either value later.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Consider confirming that narrowing rollForward from `latestFeature` to `latestPatch` won’t prevent the app from running on future minor SDK updates that might be available in your deployment environments.
- Aligning the workflow `dotnet-version` with `global.json` is good; it may be worth explicitly documenting (in code comments or variable names) that `10.0.2xx` is intentionally tied to the `10.0.200` SDK to avoid confusion when bumping either value later.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates numerous package dependencies in Directory.Packages.props, primarily bumping Microsoft and related libraries from version 10.0.2 to 10.0.3. It also updates the .NET SDK version in global.json to 10.0.200. Feedback was provided regarding the change to the rollForward policy in global.json, suggesting that latestFeature is preferred over latestPatch to prevent build failures in environments with different SDK feature bands.

Comment thread global.json
"version": "10.0.103",
"rollForward": "latestFeature"
"version": "10.0.200",
"rollForward": "latestPatch"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Changing rollForward from latestFeature to latestPatch while bumping the SDK version to a new feature band (10.0.200) is restrictive. This configuration will cause build failures on environments that have a newer feature band installed (e.g., 10.0.300) but lack the specific 10.0.2xx band. Unless there is a specific requirement to pin the build to this feature band, it is recommended to use latestFeature to allow for more flexibility across different SDK installations.

Suggested change
"rollForward": "latestPatch"
"rollForward": "latestFeature"

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant