Skip to content

Conversation

@samuel-esp
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation

Closes #361. Aligning the chart with PyKubeDownscaler chart

Changes

  • Added a dedicated priorityClassName field for main Deplyoment
  • Added a dedicated priorityClassName field for Webhook Deplyoment
  • Added documentation for both priorityClassName values

@jonathan-mayer, @JTaeuber if you prefer, we could also refactor this to a value a single shared value for both Deployments, tell me your preference about this

Tests Done

  • Chart Tests

@samuel-esp samuel-esp self-assigned this Jan 24, 2026
@samuel-esp samuel-esp added the missing feature A feature still missing from the GoKubeDownscaler, compared to the py-kube-downscaler label Jan 24, 2026
The default value for `priorityClassName` is:

```yaml
priorityClass:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
priorityClass:
priorityClassName: ""

```yaml
webhookController:
replicaCount: 1
priorityClassName: ""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was changed by accident i suppose


```yaml
webhookController:
priorityClass: ""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
priorityClass: ""
priorityClassName: ""

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

missing feature A feature still missing from the GoKubeDownscaler, compared to the py-kube-downscaler

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add PriorityClass To Helm Chart Values

2 participants