Skip to content

[DPE-7883] Logical replication loop fix#1173

Draft
marceloneppel wants to merge 1 commit into16/edgefrom
dpe-7883-logical-replication-loop-fix
Draft

[DPE-7883] Logical replication loop fix#1173
marceloneppel wants to merge 1 commit into16/edgefrom
dpe-7883-logical-replication-loop-fix

Conversation

@marceloneppel
Copy link
Member

Issue

Solution

Checklist

  • I have added or updated any relevant documentation.
  • I have cleaned any remaining cloud resources from my accounts.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <marcelo.neppel@canonical.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Libraries: OK The charm libs used are OK and in-sync label Dec 4, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 39.50617% with 98 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 65.14%. Comparing base (6bb4c2b) to head (9a89808).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on 16/edge.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/relations/logical_replication.py 39.50% 84 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (65.14%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           16/edge    #1173      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    65.91%   65.14%   -0.78%     
===========================================
  Files           18       18              
  Lines         4060     4214     +154     
  Branches       598      643      +45     
===========================================
+ Hits          2676     2745      +69     
- Misses        1182     1251      +69     
- Partials       202      218      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Libraries: OK The charm libs used are OK and in-sync

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant