Skip to content

Conversation

@cdmurph32
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes in this pull request

I'm not sure if this should live in this repository. Just trying to start a discussion.

Checklist

  • This PR represents a single feature, fix, or change.
  • All applicable changes have been documented.
  • Any TO DO items (or similar) have been entered as GitHub issues and the link to that issue has been included in a comment.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.02%. Comparing base (539adaa) to head (217658c).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1501   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.02%   78.02%           
=======================================
  Files         162      162           
  Lines       40223    40223           
=======================================
  Hits        31382    31382           
  Misses       8841     8841           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 22, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1501 will not alter performance

Comparing bindings_comparison (217658c) with main (1d12815)

Summary

✅ 16 untouched
⏩ 2 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@crandmck
Copy link
Collaborator

The md file should go into the /docs dir with the other docs.
Also please use lowercase file name bindings.md, since that's the convention.

Add cursor rules file to keep Bindings.md up to date and have the prompt
in source control.
@crandmck
Copy link
Collaborator

crandmck commented Nov 6, 2025

This is good information to have. How will we prevent this from getting outdated? Maintaining it manually is not the best solution, but it might be ok in the short term.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants