feat: statecountednodes #381
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new "ProvableCountTree" feature to GroveDB and Merk, enabling trees that cryptographically commit to their item count. The change spans core logic, serialization, proof generation/verification, and adds extensive tests. It also updates enums, encoding/decoding, cost calculations, and tree feature handling to support this new tree type, ensuring consistent behavior across the stack. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GroveDB
participant Merk
participant Proof
participant Tree
Client->>GroveDB: Insert ProvableCountTree element
GroveDB->>Merk: Create tree with ProvableCountedMerkNode
Merk->>Tree: Compute hash including count
Tree-->>Merk: Return hash
Merk-->>GroveDB: Return root hash
Client->>GroveDB: Query with proof on ProvableCountTree
GroveDB->>Merk: Generate proof (detects ProvableCountedMerkNode)
Merk->>Proof: Emit KVCount/KVHashCount nodes with count
Proof-->>Merk: Return proof bytes
Merk-->>GroveDB: Return proof
GroveDB-->>Client: Return proof
Client->>GroveDB: Verify proof
GroveDB->>Proof: Decode and verify KVCount/KVHashCount nodes
Proof->>Merk: Validate node hashes with count
Merk-->>Proof: Return verification result
Proof-->>GroveDB: Return verified root hash
GroveDB-->>Client: Return result
Estimated code review effort4 (~90–120 minutes) Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (1)
140-140: Fix clippy warning for format string.The pipeline shows a clippy warning about using variables directly in format strings.
Apply this fix:
- write!(f, "{}", node_string) + write!(f, "{node_string}")grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (1)
49-61: Consider using constants for node type markersThe code uses magic numbers
0x11(KVCount) and0x10(KV) for node type identification. While the comments explain these values, using named constants would improve readability and maintainability.+ const KVCOUNT_NODE_MARKER: u8 = 0x11; + const KV_NODE_MARKER: u8 = 0x10; + // Check if we got KVCount nodes (0x11 is the KVCount node marker) - let kvcount_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == 0x11).count(); + let kvcount_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == KVCOUNT_NODE_MARKER).count(); eprintln!("Number of KVCount nodes in proof: {}", kvcount_count); // Let's also check for regular KV nodes (0x10) - let kv_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == 0x10).count(); + let kv_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == KV_NODE_MARKER).count();grovedb/src/tests/debug_immediate_proof_check.rs (1)
84-92: Magic number usage should be replaced with constantsSimilar to the previous file, this code uses the magic number
0x11for the KVCount node marker. Consider using a named constant for better maintainability.+ const KVCOUNT_NODE_MARKER: u8 = 0x11; + // Check if we got KVCount nodes - // KVCount node marker is 0x11 - let kvcount_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == 0x11).count(); + // KVCount node marker + let kvcount_count = proof.iter().filter(|&&byte| byte == KVCOUNT_NODE_MARKER).count();grovedb/src/tests/debug_empty_tree_hash.rs (1)
23-25: Consider completing or removing the incomplete commentThe comment mentions accessing the merk directly but then says "let's skip this for now". Consider either implementing this functionality or removing the incomplete comment to avoid confusion.
- // Get the tree's root hash by getting the root hash at that path - // Note: We can't easily access the merk directly in tests, so let's skip this - // for nownode-grove/src/converter.rs (1)
107-107: Consider implementing proper value serialization.Currently,
ProvableCountTreereturns an empty nested vec like other tree types, but this might not expose the count value or root key to JavaScript consumers. Consider whether the count should be accessible from the JS side.If count access is needed from JavaScript:
- Element::ProvableCountTree(..) => nested_vecs_to_js(vec![], cx)?, + Element::ProvableCountTree(root_key, count, _) => { + // Consider serializing count and root_key if needed by JS consumers + nested_vecs_to_js(vec![], cx)? + }grovedb/src/tests/debug_feature_type_propagation.rs (1)
66-87: Consider replacing eprintln! with proper assertions.While eprintln! is useful for debugging, consider adding assertions to verify expected node types or features to make this test more robust for automated testing.
Op::Push(node) | Op::PushInverted(node) => { eprintln!(" Root layer node: {:?}", node); + // Add assertions based on expected node characteristics + // Example: assert!(matches!(node, Node::KVHash(_) | Node::Hash(_))); }merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (1)
920-943: Consider more explicit error handling for non-ProvableCountTree nodesThe fallback to 0 when the feature type doesn't match
ProvableCountedMerkNodecould hide errors. Since these methods are specifically for ProvableCountTree, consider either:
- Returning a
Resultto make the error explicit- Using
debug_assert!to catch misuse in development- Adding a more descriptive panic message
pub(crate) fn to_kv_count_node(&self) -> Node { let count = match self.tree().feature_type() { TreeFeatureType::ProvableCountedMerkNode(count) => count, - _ => 0, // Fallback, should not happen for ProvableCountTree + _ => { + debug_assert!(false, "to_kv_count_node called on non-ProvableCountedMerkNode"); + 0 + } }; Node::KVCount( self.tree().key().to_vec(), self.tree().value_ref().to_vec(), count, ) }grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type_direct.rs (2)
46-46: Simplify path construction.The current path construction is unnecessarily complex.
- vec![b"pcount".as_slice()].as_slice().into(), + &[b"pcount"],
61-66: Consider simplifying the generic type annotation.The explicit type annotation for
Noneis quite verbose for a test. You could use type inference or a simpler approach.- None::< - fn( - &[u8], - &GroveVersion, - ) -> Option<grovedb_merk::tree::kv::ValueDefinedCostType>, - >, + None,If type inference doesn't work, you could define a type alias at the top of the test for clarity.
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs (1)
11-11: Remove unused import to fix pipeline warning.The
Errorimport is not used in any of the test functions.- Error,grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_with_children.rs (1)
1-147: Consider the purpose and placement of this debug testThis test provides valuable debugging insights into ProvableCountTree proof structures, but it's primarily a debug utility rather than a validation test. Consider:
- Add assertions: If keeping as a test, add specific assertions about expected proof structure or verification results
- Alternative placement: Consider moving to a
debug_utilsmodule or similar if it's primarily for investigation- Documentation: Add comments explaining what specific issues this test helps debug
The technical implementation looks sound - it correctly creates a ProvableCountTree, generates proofs, and analyzes the structure. The debugging output will be helpful for understanding proof internals.
If keeping as a test, consider adding assertions like:
match GroveDb::verify_query_raw(&proof, &path_query, grove_version) { Ok((root_hash, _)) => { println!( "Verification succeeded! Root hash: {}", hex::encode(&root_hash) ); + assert!(!root_hash.is_empty(), "Root hash should not be empty"); } Err(e) => { println!("Verification failed: {:?}", e); + panic!("Proof verification should succeed: {:?}", e); } }merk/src/tree_type.rs (2)
33-34: Fix clippy warning for format string.The clippy warning suggests using inlined format args for better performance and readability.
- 5 => Ok(TreeType::ProvableCountTree), - n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {}, max is 5", n))), // Error handling + 5 => Ok(TreeType::ProvableCountTree), + n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {n}, max is 5"))), // Error handling
47-49: Fix clippy warning for write! macro.The clippy warning suggests using inlined format args in the write! macro.
- TreeType::ProvableCountTree => "Provable Count Tree", - }; - write!(f, "{}", s) + TreeType::ProvableCountTree => "Provable Count Tree", + }; + write!(f, "{s}")grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_mismatch.rs (1)
6-228: Consider marking this debug test with#[ignore]or documenting its purpose.This test appears to be a debugging utility with extensive println! statements and no assertions. Consider either:
- Adding
#[ignore]attribute to prevent it from running in CI- Converting it to a proper test with assertions
- Moving it to a separate debug module or example
#[test] +#[ignore = "Debug test for manual hash mismatch investigation"] fn debug_provable_count_hash_mismatch() {grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rs (1)
9-165: Consider marking this debug test appropriately.Similar to the previous debug test, this appears to be a debugging utility. Consider adding the
#[ignore]attribute or documenting its debug purpose.#[test] +#[ignore = "Debug test for manual proof verification investigation"] fn debug_provable_count_tree_with_subtree_verification() {grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_trace_verification.rs (1)
3-163: Consider adding assertions or marking as ignored testThis test function contains extensive debug output but no assertions. If this is primarily for debugging purposes, consider:
- Adding
#[ignore]attribute to prevent it from running in normal test suites- Or add assertions to verify expected behavior
#[test] +#[ignore] // Debug test - run with `cargo test -- --ignored` fn debug_provable_count_trace_verification() {Alternatively, add assertions:
match GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &path_query, grove_version) { Ok((verified_hash, results)) => { println!("\nVerification successful!"); println!("Results count: {}", results.len()); + assert_eq!(results.len(), 1, "Expected exactly one result"); + assert_eq!(results[0].1, b"alice", "Expected key to be 'alice'"); + assert_eq!(results[0].2, Element::new_item(b"value1".to_vec()), "Expected value to match");grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs (1)
236-240: Consider more robust assertion for proof differencesAsserting on proof length differences might be fragile. Consider verifying the actual structural differences or specific proof content instead.
- // The proofs should have different structures - assert_ne!( - regular_proof.len(), - provable_proof.len(), - "Proofs should differ between regular and provable count trees" - ); + // The proofs should have different structures + // Decode and verify that provable proof contains count-related nodes + let config = bincode::config::standard() + .with_big_endian() + .with_no_limit(); + let decoded_provable: crate::operations::proof::GroveDBProof = + bincode::decode_from_slice(&provable_proof, config).unwrap().0; + // Add specific assertions about the proof structure containing count nodes
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (60)
grovedb/src/batch/mod.rs(6 hunks)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/element/delete.rs(3 hunks)grovedb/src/element/get.rs(2 hunks)grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs(17 hunks)grovedb/src/element/mod.rs(4 hunks)grovedb/src/lib.rs(3 hunks)grovedb/src/operations/get/query.rs(5 hunks)grovedb/src/operations/proof/generate.rs(3 hunks)grovedb/src/operations/proof/mod.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs(5 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_empty_tree_hash.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_feature_type_propagation.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_fix_approach.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_hash_calculation_trace.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_immediate_proof_check.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_verification.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_with_children.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type_direct.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_hash_investigation.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_correct_path.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_fix.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_calculation.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_investigation.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_mismatch.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_trace_verification.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_tree_issue.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_provable_count.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs(2 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_comprehensive_test.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/sum_tree_tests.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/tests/test_provable_count_fresh.rs(1 hunks)grovedb/src/visualize.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/merk/chunks.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/merk/mod.rs(5 hunks)merk/src/proofs/chunk/chunk.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/proofs/encoding.rs(6 hunks)merk/src/proofs/mod.rs(2 hunks)merk/src/proofs/query/map.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs(4 hunks)merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/proofs/tree.rs(4 hunks)merk/src/tree/hash.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/tree/link.rs(6 hunks)merk/src/tree/mod.rs(11 hunks)merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/tree/test_provable_count_edge_cases.rs(1 hunks)merk/src/tree/tree_feature_type.rs(13 hunks)merk/src/tree_type.rs(6 hunks)node-grove/src/converter.rs(3 hunks)
🧠 Learnings (54)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: dashpay/grovedb#366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: dashpay/grovedb#366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/sum_tree_tests.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/element/delete.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_fix_approach.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/test_provable_count_fresh.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_correct_path.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/get.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/visualize.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_calculation.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type_direct.rs (4)
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_provable_count.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count_edge_cases.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_fix.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type.rs (4)
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/lib.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_feature_type_propagation.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_tree_issue.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/generate.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
node-grove/src/converter.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/batch/mod.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/util/tx_ref.rs:35-42
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:18:22.104Z
Learning: GroveDB uses batches for atomic operations instead of explicit transaction rollbacks. Batches ensure that operations either all succeed or all fail, making explicit rollbacks unnecessary.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_mismatch.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/operations/get/query.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_hash_calculation_trace.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_verification.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/merk/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_with_children.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_empty_tree_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_investigation.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_trace_verification.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_immediate_proof_check.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/tree_type.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_hash_investigation.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/mod.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_comprehensive_test.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/tree_feature_type.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (10)
merk/src/tree/hash.rs (1)
merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
new(351-359)hash(113-172)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs (7)
merk/src/tree/hash.rs (3)
combine_hash(133-145)kv_digest_to_kv_hash(85-103)node_hash_with_count(149-171)grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (1)
hash(113-172)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query(594-613)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs (8)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (2)
make_deep_tree(139-551)format(1238-1238)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (2)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)new_item(77-79)merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
key(321-329)new(351-359)merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (3)
encode(138-171)new_single_key(324-330)new(310-312)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
operations(778-812)merk/src/proofs/encoding.rs (1)
new(488-493)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (4)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_test_grovedb(102-114)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (2)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)
node-grove/src/converter.rs (1)
grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (1)
new_provable_count_tree(263-265)
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (1)
grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs (1)
hex_to_ascii(284-299)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs (5)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/element/query.rs (1)
query_item(713-896)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query(594-613)
merk/src/merk/mod.rs (3)
grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs (1)
tree_type(208-218)merk/src/tree/link.rs (2)
tree(141-149)aggregate_data(168-175)merk/src/tree/mod.rs (1)
aggregate_data(598-654)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs (5)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/element/query.rs (1)
query_item(713-896)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query_with_options(29-68)
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (4)
merk/src/tree/walk/mod.rs (1)
tree(173-175)merk/src/tree/walk/ref_walker.rs (1)
tree(43-45)merk/src/tree/mod.rs (1)
feature_type(373-375)merk/src/tree/kv.rs (1)
feature_type(258-260)
🪛 GitHub Actions: GroveDB
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs
[warning] 140-140: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", node_string) to write!(f, "{node_string}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/merk/mod.rs
[warning] 230-230: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", description) to write!(f, "{description}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 635-635: Clippy warning: very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions. (clippy::type_complexity)
[warning] 695-704: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
merk/src/merk/chunks.rs
[warning] 363-363: Very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions.
[warning] 393-393: Very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions.
merk/src/tree_type.rs
[warning] 34-34: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("got {}, max is 5", n) to format!("got {n}, max is 5"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 49-49: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", s) to write!(f, "{s}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs
[warning] 240-243: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("Proof returns more data than limit {:?}", original_limit) to format!("Proof returns more data than limit {original_limit}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 328-332: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("Proof is missing data for query range. Encountered unexpected node type: {}", node) to format!("Proof is missing data for query range. Encountered unexpected node type: {node}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 502-502: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {}: {},", index, proved_key_value) to writeln!(f, " {index}: {proved_key_value},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs
[warning] 11-11: Unused import 'Error'.
merk/src/tree/mod.rs
[warning] 868-894: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
[warning] 924-950: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
[warning] 982-1009: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (9/7). (too_many_arguments)
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs
[warning] 894-894: Clippy warning: method to_kv_value_hash_feature_type_node is never used. (dead_code)
[warning] 273-273: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "subquery: {} ", subquery) to write!(f, "subquery: {subquery} "). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 287-287: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {},", item) to writeln!(f, " {item},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 298-298: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {}: {},", item, branch) to writeln!(f, " {item}: {branch},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 741-741: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change .map(|b| format!("{:X?}", b)) to .map(|b| format!("{b:X?}")). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 745-745: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change .map(|r| format!("{}", r)) to .map(|r| format!("{r}")). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 792-792: Clippy warning: this expression creates a reference which is immediately dereferenced by the compiler. Suggestion: change query_item_key.cmp(&key) to query_item_key.cmp(key). (needless_borrow)
🪛 GitHub Check: clippy
merk/src/tree_type.rs
[warning] 34-34: variables can be used directly in the format! string
warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string
--> merk/src/tree_type.rs:34:45
|
34 | n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {}, max is 5", n))), // Error handling
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
help: change this to
|
34 - n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {}, max is 5", n))), // Error handling
34 + n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {n}, max is 5"))), // Error handling
|
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (54)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: dashpay/grovedb#366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: dashpay/grovedb#366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/sum_tree_tests.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/element/delete.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_fix_approach.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/test_provable_count_fresh.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_correct_path.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/get.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/visualize.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_calculation.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type_direct.rs (4)
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_provable_count.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count_edge_cases.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_fix.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type.rs (4)
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/lib.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_feature_type_propagation.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_tree_issue.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/generate.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
node-grove/src/converter.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/batch/mod.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/util/tx_ref.rs:35-42
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:18:22.104Z
Learning: GroveDB uses batches for atomic operations instead of explicit transaction rollbacks. Batches ensure that operations either all succeed or all fail, making explicit rollbacks unnecessary.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_mismatch.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/operations/get/query.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_hash_calculation_trace.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_verification.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/merk/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_with_children.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_empty_tree_hash.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_investigation.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_trace_verification.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_immediate_proof_check.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/tree_type.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_hash_investigation.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs (4)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/mod.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: ktechmidas
PR: #378
File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z
Learning: The crate grovedbg-types is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of grovedb-types.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_comprehensive_test.rs (3)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: fominok
PR: #345
File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z
Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function delete_internal_on_transaction in grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs which is legacy code.
grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
merk/src/tree/tree_feature_type.rs (2)
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
Learnt from: pauldelucia
PR: #366
File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z
Learning: The Error::InvalidProofError in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own Error::InvalidProof variant. These are separate error types from different crates.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (10)
merk/src/tree/hash.rs (1)
merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
new(351-359)hash(113-172)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs (7)
merk/src/tree/hash.rs (3)
combine_hash(133-145)kv_digest_to_kv_hash(85-103)node_hash_with_count(149-171)grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (1)
hash(113-172)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query(594-613)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs (8)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (2)
make_deep_tree(139-551)format(1238-1238)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (2)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)new_item(77-79)merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (2)
key(321-329)new(351-359)merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (3)
encode(138-171)new_single_key(324-330)new(310-312)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
operations(778-812)merk/src/proofs/encoding.rs (1)
new(488-493)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (4)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_test_grovedb(102-114)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (2)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/query/mod.rs (1)
new_unsized(134-137)
node-grove/src/converter.rs (1)
grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (1)
new_provable_count_tree(263-265)
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (1)
grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs (1)
hex_to_ascii(284-299)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs (5)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/element/query.rs (1)
query_item(713-896)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query(594-613)
merk/src/merk/mod.rs (3)
grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs (1)
tree_type(208-218)merk/src/tree/link.rs (2)
tree(141-149)aggregate_data(168-175)merk/src/tree/mod.rs (1)
aggregate_data(598-654)
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs (5)
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
make_empty_grovedb(92-99)grovedb-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
latest(26-30)grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (3)
empty_provable_count_tree(251-253)empty_tree(17-19)new_item(77-79)grovedb/src/element/query.rs (1)
query_item(713-896)grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (1)
verify_query_with_options(29-68)
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs (4)
merk/src/tree/walk/mod.rs (1)
tree(173-175)merk/src/tree/walk/ref_walker.rs (1)
tree(43-45)merk/src/tree/mod.rs (1)
feature_type(373-375)merk/src/tree/kv.rs (1)
feature_type(258-260)
🪛 GitHub Actions: GroveDB
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs
[warning] 140-140: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", node_string) to write!(f, "{node_string}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/merk/mod.rs
[warning] 230-230: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", description) to write!(f, "{description}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 635-635: Clippy warning: very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions. (clippy::type_complexity)
[warning] 695-704: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
merk/src/merk/chunks.rs
[warning] 363-363: Very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions.
[warning] 393-393: Very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into type definitions.
merk/src/tree_type.rs
[warning] 34-34: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("got {}, max is 5", n) to format!("got {n}, max is 5"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 49-49: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "{}", s) to write!(f, "{s}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs
[warning] 240-243: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("Proof returns more data than limit {:?}", original_limit) to format!("Proof returns more data than limit {original_limit}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 328-332: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change format!("Proof is missing data for query range. Encountered unexpected node type: {}", node) to format!("Proof is missing data for query range. Encountered unexpected node type: {node}"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 502-502: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {}: {},", index, proved_key_value) to writeln!(f, " {index}: {proved_key_value},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs
[warning] 11-11: Unused import 'Error'.
merk/src/tree/mod.rs
[warning] 868-894: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
[warning] 924-950: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (8/7). (too_many_arguments)
[warning] 982-1009: Clippy warning: this function has too many arguments (9/7). (too_many_arguments)
merk/src/proofs/query/mod.rs
[warning] 894-894: Clippy warning: method to_kv_value_hash_feature_type_node is never used. (dead_code)
[warning] 273-273: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change write!(f, "subquery: {} ", subquery) to write!(f, "subquery: {subquery} "). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 287-287: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {},", item) to writeln!(f, " {item},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 298-298: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change writeln!(f, " {}: {},", item, branch) to writeln!(f, " {item}: {branch},"). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 741-741: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change .map(|b| format!("{:X?}", b)) to .map(|b| format!("{b:X?}")). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 745-745: Clippy warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string. Suggestion: change .map(|r| format!("{}", r)) to .map(|r| format!("{r}")). (clippy::uninlined_format_args)
[warning] 792-792: Clippy warning: this expression creates a reference which is immediately dereferenced by the compiler. Suggestion: change query_item_key.cmp(&key) to query_item_key.cmp(key). (needless_borrow)
🪛 GitHub Check: clippy
merk/src/tree_type.rs
[warning] 34-34: variables can be used directly in the format! string
warning: variables can be used directly in the format! string
--> merk/src/tree_type.rs:34:45
|
34 | n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {}, max is 5", n))), // Error handling
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
help: change this to
|
34 - n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {}, max is 5", n))), // Error handling
34 + n => Err(Error::UnknownTreeType(format!("got {n}, max is 5"))), // Error handling
|
🔇 Additional comments (147)
grovedb/src/tests/sum_tree_tests.rs (1)
1789-1789: LGTM: Clean up unused variableGood practice to prefix unused variables with underscore to indicate they are intentionally unused. This maintains code clarity without affecting functionality.
merk/src/merk/chunks.rs (1)
464-465: LGTM: Proper integration of new node variantsThe new
KVCountandKVHashCountnode variants are correctly integrated into the counting logic by treating them equivalently to their base counterparts (KVandKVHash). This approach maintains consistency with the existing node type categorization while supporting the new ProvableCountTree functionality.merk/src/proofs/query/map.rs (1)
43-45: LGTM: Correct handling of new KVCount node variantThe addition of
Node::KVCount(key, value, _)to the match statement properly integrates the new node type into the map building logic. Ignoring the count field with_is appropriate since the map builder only needs the key-value pairs for constructing the result map. This maintains consistency with the existing handling of other KV-type nodes.grovedb/src/operations/proof/mod.rs (1)
288-296: LGTM! Well-implemented node formatting for count variants.The formatting for
KVCountandKVHashCountis consistent with existing node variants and properly uses the helper functions for ASCII conversion.merk/src/proofs/chunk/chunk.rs (1)
89-96: Good refactoring for clarity.Making the node construction explicit improves code readability, and the comment clearly explains why value hash is used for chunks (restoration vs query proofs).
merk/src/tree/hash.rs (1)
147-171: Well-implemented count-aware hashing function.The
node_hash_with_countfunction correctly extends the existing hashing pattern to include count data. The use ofto_be_bytes()for consistent count encoding and the cost accounting are appropriate.grovedb/src/visualize.rs (1)
130-146: Good visualization support for ProvableCountTree.The visualization implementation follows the established pattern for other tree variants and properly handles the root key, value, and flags. The cleanup of the CountSumTree flags handling also improves consistency.
merk/src/proofs/mod.rs (2)
86-92: Well-designed node variants for count tracking.The
KVCountandKVHashCountvariants properly represent nodes with associated counts, which is essential for the ProvableCountTree functionality.
130-138: Display implementations are consistent and well-formatted.The formatting for both count variants follows the established pattern and uses appropriate helper functions for ASCII conversion.
grovedb/src/element/get.rs (2)
215-216: LGTM: Consistent integration of ProvableCountTree in storage cost accounting.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto the match arm follows the established pattern and correctly includes it in the storage cost calculation alongside other tree types.
298-299: LGTM: Consistent integration of ProvableCountTree in v1 storage retrieval.The addition of
ProvableCountTreemaintains consistency with the v0 implementation and correctly applies the same cost calculation logic as other tree variants.grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_provable_count.rs (1)
1-64: LGTM: Well-structured debug test for ProvableCountTree basic functionality.This test provides a clean, focused validation of basic ProvableCountTree operations including insertion, querying, proof generation, and verification. The test structure follows good practices with proper error handling and meaningful assertions.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_investigation.rs (1)
1-68: LGTM: Comprehensive debug test for hash calculation investigation.This debug test provides thorough investigation capabilities for ProvableCountTree hash calculation issues. The extensive debug output covering serialization, hashing, and feature types will be valuable for troubleshooting. The investigative nature justifies the lack of assertions.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_hash_investigation.rs (1)
1-44: LGTM: Valuable investigative test with excellent documentation.This debug test effectively documents the fundamental proof verification issue with ProvableCountTree nodes. The detailed comments explaining the mismatch between proof generation and verification provide valuable context for future development work. The identified solution path is clearly articulated.
grovedb/src/element/delete.rs (3)
38-39: LGTM: Consistent integration of ProvableCountTree in delete operation.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto both layered and non-layered deletion cases follows the established pattern and correctly treats it identically toCountSumTreefor operation selection.Also applies to: 43-44
99-100: LGTM: Consistent pattern in sectioned removal deletion.The integration of
ProvableCountTreein the sectioned removal deletion method maintains the same pattern as the basic delete method, ensuring consistent behavior across deletion operations.Also applies to: 104-105
154-155: LGTM: Complete integration in batch operations.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto the batch operations deletion method completes the consistent integration across all deletion operation types, maintaining the established pattern.Also applies to: 159-160
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_stale_hash.rs (3)
6-22: Test setup and initial insertion look correctThe test properly initializes with the latest GroveVersion and uses the provided
make_deep_treehelper. The insertion of an empty ProvableCountTree is correctly structured.
24-86: Sequential insertion with debug output is well-structuredThe loop that inserts items sequentially while printing debug information before and after each insertion provides valuable insight into how the ProvableCountTree state changes. The debug output includes both the tree element details and root hash changes, which is useful for debugging stale hash issues.
88-135: Proof generation and examination logic is comprehensiveThe proof generation and decoding logic correctly:
- Creates a PathQuery for the "verified" key
- Generates the proof using
prove_query- Decodes the proof using bincode with proper configuration
- Iterates through proof operations to find the target node
- Extracts and displays relevant information about the proven element
The examination of proof operations specifically looking for
KVValueHashnodes containing the "verified" key is appropriate for debugging proof structure.grovedb/src/tests/debug_simple_proof_check.rs (2)
9-36: Test setup and insertions are correctly implementedThe test properly initializes the database and inserts both the ProvableCountTree and a single item. The structure follows the expected pattern for testing provable count functionality.
38-46: Query construction and proof generation are appropriateThe PathQuery construction for querying all items under the "pcount" path and the subsequent proof generation are correctly implemented.
grovedb/src/tests/test_provable_count_fresh.rs (3)
9-36: Test initialization and data insertion are well-structuredThe test correctly sets up the database, inserts a ProvableCountTree, and adds a test item. The error handling with
.unwrap().expect()provides clear failure messages.
38-47: Query construction and proof generation are appropriateThe query construction using
Query::new()andinsert_key()to target a specific key is correct. The PathQuery wraps this appropriately for the test scenario.
49-64: Verification logic and assertions are comprehensiveThe test properly verifies the generated proof and includes meaningful assertions:
- Root hash verification ensures proof integrity
- Proved values count verification ensures correct query results
- Key verification ensures the correct item was proved
- Debug output for the proved value aids in troubleshooting
The comment about value wrapping in Element serialization shows good awareness of the underlying mechanics.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_immediate_proof_check.rs (3)
9-26: Test initialization and ProvableCountTree creation are correctThe test setup with debug section headers and the ProvableCountTree insertion are properly implemented. The debug output provides good visibility into test progress.
27-61: Multiple item insertions with debug output are well-structuredThe sequential insertion of three items (alice, bob, charlie) with debug output provides good test coverage and visibility. Each insertion is properly error-handled.
94-105: Root hash verification logic is comprehensiveThe verification that compares the verified hash from the proof with the actual database root hash is a crucial test for proof integrity. This ensures the proof correctly represents the current database state.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_empty_tree_hash.rs (3)
5-21: Test setup and empty tree insertion are correctThe test properly initializes with the latest GroveVersion and inserts an empty tree element. The use of
make_empty_grovedb()is appropriate for this test scenario.
27-43: Element serialization and hashing logic are appropriateThe test correctly retrieves the inserted element, serializes it, and calculates the value hash using the
value_hashfunction from Merk. The debug output provides useful information about the serialized form and hash.
45-67: Proof generation and examination are well-implementedThe proof generation using PathQuery and the subsequent decoding and examination of proof operations provide valuable insight into how empty trees are represented in proofs. The debug output shows the internal proof structure.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_tree_issue.rs (3)
6-22: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test initialization correctly creates a ProvableCountTree with an initial root key and uses the deep tree test fixture. The setup follows established patterns for GroveDB testing.
87-101: LGTM! Comprehensive proof verification.The proof generation and verification logic is thorough, checking both the proof generation success and verifying that the root hashes match. This validates the cryptographic integrity of the ProvableCountTree proofs.
71-84: Double-check ProvableCountTree count semanticsThe test at grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_tree_issue.rs (lines 71–84) currently asserts that inserting four items yields
count_after == 4. Before locking in this expectation, verify that thecountfield inProvableCountTreeindeed tracks the number of inserted elements (leaf count) and not some other metric (e.g. total nodes, hash operations, or aggregated values).• Inspect the
ProvableCountTreedefinition and its update logic in the tree module (e.g. grovedb/src/tree/… files) to confirm whatcountrepresents.
• Check that each insertion increments thiscountby one.
• Ifcountis intended to represent a different metric, adjust the test’s expected value or clarify the semantics in documentation.node-grove/src/converter.rs (2)
44-44: LGTM! Consistent string representation.The string representation "provable_count_tree" follows the established naming convention and maintains consistency with other element types.
76-80: LGTM! Proper JS to Rust conversion.The conversion correctly uses
Element::new_provable_count_tree()constructor and follows the same pattern as the "tree" case above. The buffer extraction and conversion logic is consistent.grovedb/src/tests/debug_feature_type_propagation.rs (1)
39-51: LGTM! Direct merk inspection for debugging.The approach of opening the transactional merk directly to inspect the tree type is appropriate for this debug test. This provides visibility into the internal state that's useful for verifying feature type propagation.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_fix.rs (2)
64-75: LGTM! Comprehensive proof verification with hash validation.The use of
VerifyOptions::default()and explicit hash comparison provides thorough validation of the proof integrity. The assertion ensures cryptographic consistency between the database state and proof.
76-82: LGTM! Thorough result validation.The result validation checks path, key, and element presence, ensuring the proof contains the expected data. This comprehensive verification helps catch potential issues in proof generation or verification logic.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs (1)
65-73: LGTM! Proper error handling and assertion.The match statement properly handles both success and error cases, with meaningful error messages. The assertion that exactly one result should be found is appropriate for a direct key query.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type.rs (4)
1-9: LGTM! Well-structured debug test module.The module structure, imports, and test configuration are appropriate for debugging ProvableCountTree feature type verification.
10-26: LGTM! Clean test setup.The test initialization and ProvableCountTree creation follow good testing patterns with appropriate error handling.
27-52: LGTM! Proper item insertion and merk handling.The test items are inserted correctly into the ProvableCountTree, and the transactional merk is opened with appropriate error handling.
53-107: LGTM! Comprehensive feature type verification.The test thoroughly verifies the ProvableCountedMerkNode feature type through both merk interface and direct element testing, with helpful debug output and appropriate error handling.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_fix_approach.rs (3)
1-21: Excellent problem documentation and solution analysis.The detailed comments clearly explain the proof verification issue with ProvableCountTree and outline potential approaches to fix it. This documentation will be valuable for implementing the actual solution.
22-49: LGTM! Clean test setup for exploring the fix approach.The test initialization and data setup are appropriate for demonstrating the proof verification issue.
50-62: LGTM! Clear solution documentation and guidance.The three potential solution options are well-documented, and the test correctly identifies that the actual implementation needs to be in the merk query proof generation code.
merk/src/merk/mod.rs (4)
253-254: LGTM! Consistent addition of ProvableCountNode variant.The new ProvableCountNode variant follows the established pattern of other node types in the enum.
264-265: LGTM! Appropriate feature length for ProvableCountNode.The feature length of 9 matches CountNode, which is appropriate given their similar functionality.
275-276: LGTM! Appropriate cost setting for ProvableCountNode.The cost of 8 matches CountNode, maintaining consistency with similar node types.
316-323: LGTM! Critical enhancement for tree-type-specific hash computation.The change from
hash()tohash_for_link(tree_type)enables proper hash computation for different tree types, which is essential for ProvableCountTree's cryptographic commitments. The implementation maintains backward compatibility while adding the necessary functionality.Also applies to: 353-366
grovedb/src/batch/mod.rs (7)
1023-1027: LGTM: Consistent error handling pattern for tree references.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto this match arm correctly prevents references from pointing to trees being updated, maintaining consistency with other tree types.
1146-1150: LGTM: Proper reference validation for ProvableCountTree.The inclusion of
ProvableCountTreein the error handling ensures that references cannot point to trees being updated during batch operations, following the established pattern for other tree variants.
1178-1182: LGTM: Complete reference validation coverage.This ensures all tree types, including the new
ProvableCountTree, are properly handled in the reference validation logic for insert-only operations.
1355-1356: LGTM: Consistent tree element handling in batch operations.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto this match arm ensures it's treated like other tree types during batch processing, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
1578-1584: LGTM: Proper handling of ProvableCount aggregate data.The new match arm correctly creates a
ProvableCountTreeelement with the provided count value and flags, following the same pattern as other aggregate data types likeCountandCountAndSum.
1674-1675: LGTM: Correct inclusion in value-defined cost recalculation.Including
ProvableCountTreein this match ensures that elements of this type are properly handled during flag updates and cost recalculation, maintaining consistency with other tree types.
1683-1683: LGTM: Appropriate cost size assignment.Using
COUNT_TREE_COST_SIZEforProvableCountTreeis logical since both tree types have similar functionality - they both maintain count information. This provides consistent cost calculation behavior.grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_correct_path.rs (7)
1-6: LGTM: Well-structured test setupThe imports are minimal and focused, and the test function name clearly indicates its purpose for debugging provable count tree path correctness.
5-19: LGTM: Proper test initializationThe test setup correctly initializes the GroveDB instance and creates a provable count tree using the new API. Error handling is appropriate for test code.
21-32: LGTM: Correct nested tree structureThe test correctly creates a nested tree inside the provable count tree, demonstrating the hierarchical structure that the new feature supports.
34-46: LGTM: Proper item insertionThe item insertion correctly uses the nested path structure and creates the item element appropriately for testing the complete tree hierarchy.
48-65: LGTM: Correct proof query setupThe path query correctly targets the nested item with the proper path structure. Getting the root hash before proof generation enables verification of proof consistency.
67-72: LGTM: Standard proof generationThe proof generation follows the correct API pattern and includes helpful debug output for understanding proof characteristics.
74-89: LGTM: Comprehensive proof verificationThe proof verification correctly validates both the root hash consistency and the expected result count. The debug output and error handling are appropriate for testing the new provable count tree functionality.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash_calculation.rs (4)
1-6: LGTM: Clear test purposeThe test function name clearly indicates its debugging purpose for hash calculations in provable count trees.
5-26: LGTM: Good debugging approachThe step-by-step hash tracking with debug output will be valuable for understanding how provable count tree operations affect root hash calculations.
28-56: LGTM: Valuable element state debuggingThe element retrieval and inspection after nested tree creation provides important insights into how provable count trees track their internal state.
58-82: LGTM: Complete hash progression trackingThe test effectively tracks the complete progression of hash changes from empty tree through nested tree creation to final item insertion, providing comprehensive debugging information.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs (6)
1-3: LGTM: Appropriate low-level hash function importsThe imports of internal hash functions are justified for this debug test that needs to manually verify hash calculations for layered reference debugging.
5-48: LGTM: Consistent test setupThe test setup follows the same pattern as the other debug tests, creating a consistent scenario for comparative hash analysis.
50-64: LGTM: Valuable serialization analysisThe element serialization and manual value hash calculation provide crucial insights into the internal representation and hash computation process.
66-74: LGTM: Valuable documentation commentsThe detailed comments documenting the serialization format and layered reference structure are valuable for understanding the internal representation.
75-121: LGTM: Sophisticated hash analysis with good edge case handlingThe manual hash calculations and comparison between
combine_hashandnode_hash_with_countapproaches provide valuable insights into the internal hash computation differences. The edge case handling for non-32-byte hashes is prudent.
123-140: LGTM: Complete proof verification cycleThe proof generation and verification for the nested tree completes the debugging analysis, showing how the manual hash calculations relate to the proof system behavior.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_node_feature_type_direct.rs (1)
11-111: Well-structured test for ProvableCountTree feature types.The test provides comprehensive coverage of:
- Creating and populating a ProvableCountTree
- Direct inspection of node feature types
- Verification that nodes have the correct ProvableCountedMerkNode feature type
The debug output and error handling are particularly helpful for troubleshooting.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/verify.rs (4)
9-9: Good cleanup - removed unused import.Removing the unused
TreeTypeimport helps maintain clean code.
355-366: Excellent debug output additions.The added debug output under the
proof_debugfeature flag provides valuable information for troubleshooting proof verification issues, including:
- Current path and calculated root hash
- Parent tree type information
- Detailed tree element verification data
Also applies to: 457-472, 500-522
402-403: Consistent integration of ProvableCountTree variant.The ProvableCountTree variant has been properly added to all relevant match arms, maintaining consistency with other tree types in:
- Elements with lower layers
- Elements without lower layers
- Layered reference checks
Also applies to: 313-313, 480-480, 543-543
473-498: Layered reference proof verification logic is correct and fully covered
- Storage combines element and subtree root per adr/grovedb-structure.md (
value_hash = Hash(serialized_tree_element + root_hash_of_sub_merk)).- Tests in grovedb/src/tests/debug_layered_reference_hash.rs validate the layered-reference path.
- Layered reference ops are documented in grovedb/src/element/insert.rs and merk/src/tree/ops.rs.
- The verify.rs code’s
hash.to_owned()for layered references matches the stored combined hash.No changes needed.
grovedb/src/operations/proof/generate.rs (2)
250-253: Proper handling of KVCount nodes in proof generation.The KVCount node variant is correctly included alongside KV and KVValueHash nodes for deserialization and processing during proof generation.
312-313: Consistent integration of ProvableCountTree in proof traversal.ProvableCountTree is properly included in:
- Subquery traversal for trees with elements (lines 312-313)
- Tree handling without subqueries (lines 351-356)
This ensures provable count trees are handled correctly during recursive proof generation.
Also applies to: 351-356
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_nested_tree.rs (1)
3-110: Comprehensive test for nested trees within ProvableCountTree.This test effectively validates that:
- Nested trees can be created within a ProvableCountTree
- Items can be inserted into nested trees
- Proofs can be generated and verified for queries on nested items
- Root hash remains consistent through proof generation and verification
The test structure is clear and the debug output is helpful.
grovedb/src/element/mod.rs (3)
107-107: Appropriate cost size for ProvableCountTree.Setting the cost size to
COUNT_TREE_COST_SIZEis correct since ProvableCountTree has similar storage requirements to CountTree.
142-143: Well-integrated ProvableCountTree variant.The new
ProvableCountTreevariant follows the established pattern with:
- Optional root key (Vec)
- Count value (CountValue)
- Optional flags (ElementFlags)
The comment clearly indicates its purpose: "Same as Element::CountTree but includes counts in cryptographic state".
235-245: Consistent Display implementation and type string.The Display implementation and type_str for ProvableCountTree are consistent with other tree variants, ensuring proper debugging and logging support.
Also applies to: 261-261
grovedb/src/lib.rs (3)
685-697: LGTM! Consistent implementation following established patterns.The addition of
ProvableCountTreesupport toupdate_tree_item_preserve_flagfollows the exact same pattern asCountTree, which is appropriate since both tree types track count data but differ in their provability characteristics.
817-835: LGTM! Proper batch operation support for ProvableCountTree.The implementation correctly mirrors the
CountTreepattern for batch operations, ensuring consistent behavior across both synchronous and batch execution paths. The feature type retrieval and batch operation handling are implemented correctly.
1051-1052: LGTM! Complete verification support for ProvableCountTree.The addition of
ProvableCountTreeto the verification match pattern ensures that the new tree type is properly handled during database integrity checks, maintaining consistency with other tree variants.merk/src/tree/test_provable_count.rs (4)
14-58: Excellent test coverage for hash uniqueness.This test effectively validates that:
- ProvableCountTree hashes differ when counts differ (same key-value pairs)
- ProvableCountTree hashes differ from regular CountTree hashes
- The hash calculation properly incorporates the count value
The test design ensures the cryptographic integrity of the ProvableCountTree implementation.
60-67: Good validation of aggregate data conversion.The test correctly verifies that
TreeFeatureType::ProvableCountedMerkNodeconverts to the appropriateAggregateData::ProvableCountvariant, ensuring type system consistency.
69-86: Comprehensive tree type conversion testing.This test validates multiple important aspects:
- TreeType to TreeFeatureType conversion with correct default count (0)
- Node type enumeration value (5 for ProvableCountNode)
- Constraint verification (sum items not allowed)
The assertions properly validate the expected behavior and constraints.
88-115: Solid foundation for aggregate data testing.The test correctly validates that a ProvableCountTree node returns the expected
AggregateData::ProvableCountwith the node's own count. The comments appropriately acknowledge that child aggregation would be tested in integration scenarios.grovedb/src/operations/get/query.rs (5)
235-236: LGTM: Consistent handling of ProvableCountTree in follow_elementThe addition of
Element::ProvableCountTree(..)to the match arms that return the element as-is is correct and consistent with how other tree-like elements are handled.
359-360: LGTM: Proper validation for ProvableCountTree in query_item_valueCorrectly treating
ProvableCountTreeas an invalid target for direct value queries, consistent with other tree element types.
453-455: LGTM: Correct count value extraction for ProvableCountTreeProperly extracting the count value from
ProvableCountTreeelements when following references, consistent withCountTreehandling.
482-484: LGTM: Consistent count value extraction for direct elementsCorrectly returning the count value from
ProvableCountTreeelements in direct element processing, matching the pattern used forCountTree.
571-571: LGTM: Proper validation for ProvableCountTree in sum queriesCorrectly excluding
ProvableCountTreefrom sum queries since it doesn't contain sum values, maintaining consistency with other non-sum element types.merk/src/proofs/query/verify.rs (3)
312-318: LGTM: Correct handling of KVCount node in proof verificationThe implementation properly extracts key and value from the
KVCountnode and calculates the value hash correctly. The count parameter is appropriately ignored during verification as it's structural metadata.
319-325: LGTM: Proper handling of KVValueHashFeatureType nodeCorrectly using the provided value hash and ignoring the feature type parameter during verification. The implementation follows the established pattern for nodes with pre-calculated hashes.
326-326: LGTM: Consistent error handling for KVHashCount nodesCorrectly including
KVHashCountin the pattern that handles hash-only nodes, maintaining proper error reporting when data is expected but only hashes are provided.merk/src/tree/test_provable_count_edge_cases.rs (1)
1-320: Excellent comprehensive edge case test coverage for ProvableCountTree.This test module provides thorough coverage of edge cases for the new ProvableCountTree functionality, including:
- Zero and maximum count handling
- Hash determinism and uniqueness
- Serialization/deserialization correctness
- Comparison with regular CountTree behavior
- Empty key/value scenarios
- Overflow protection
- Type conversion validation
- Debug output verification
The tests are well-structured, descriptive, and cover critical edge cases that could cause issues in production.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_kvcount_verification.rs (1)
1-92: Valuable debugging test for ProvableCountTree verification logic.This test effectively demonstrates the verification discrepancy where current verification uses KV hash instead of the correct node hash with count. The manual hash calculations and comparisons provide clear insight into the issue.
The test serves as both documentation of the problem and a verification tool for when the fix is implemented.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_hash_calculation_trace.rs (1)
1-85: Useful debugging test for tracing ProvableCountTree hash calculations.This test provides valuable debugging capabilities by tracing the hash calculation process, element serialization, and proof structure for ProvableCountTree elements. The detailed logging helps understand the internal behavior during proof generation.
The systematic approach of creating nested trees, calculating hashes, and decoding proofs makes this an effective debugging tool.
merk/src/tree_type.rs (1)
20-20: ProvableCountTree variant properly integrated.The new
ProvableCountTreevariant is correctly added with discriminant value 5 and properly integrated into all relevant TreeType methods.grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_hash.rs (1)
1-173: Comprehensive debugging test for ProvableCountTree hash and proof analysis.This test provides excellent debugging capabilities for ProvableCountTree functionality by:
- Systematically inserting multiple items and examining the tree state
- Tracing serialization and hash calculations
- Generating and decoding proofs to inspect their structure
- Examining proof operations in detail with clear logging
The methodical approach and detailed output make this an effective tool for understanding and debugging ProvableCountTree behavior.
grovedb/src/element/constructor.rs (1)
249-284: LGTM! Well-structured constructors following established patterns.The new ProvableCountTree constructors are consistent with existing tree constructor patterns, properly initializing with default values and providing flexible construction options.
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rs (1)
93-93: Mark debug-only test as ignored by defaultThe
debug_provable_count_tree_with_subtree_verificationtest in
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_proof.rsis intended purely as a debug utility. Running it unconditionally can clutter CI logs and slow down the suite.• Annotate this test (and any similar debug tests in the file) with
#[ignore], for example:#[test] #[ignore = "debug-only: run with `cargo test -- --ignored`"] fn debug_provable_count_tree_with_subtree_verification() { /* … */ }• Optionally, you can also gate the debug logic on
GROVEDB_PROOF_DEBUGbeing set before the first call toGroveDb::verify_query, but the existingstd::env::set_var("GROVEDB_PROOF_DEBUG", "1")before the retry is acceptable since it affects subsequent calls.⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: fominok PR: dashpay/grovedb#345 File: grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs:19-35 Timestamp: 2025-02-18T08:17:30.690Z Learning: Refactoring suggestions for legacy code should be avoided as they are considered out of scope for feature PRs. This includes the function `delete_internal_on_transaction` in `grovedb/src/operations/delete/v1.rs` which is legacy code.Learnt from: pauldelucia PR: dashpay/grovedb#366 File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7 Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.Learnt from: pauldelucia PR: dashpay/grovedb#366 File: grovedb/src/error.rs:7-7 Timestamp: 2025-04-18T06:12:25.554Z Learning: The `Error::InvalidProofError` in grovedb/src/operations/proof/util.rs is from the merk error handling system, distinct from grovedb's own `Error::InvalidProof` variant. These are separate error types from different crates.Learnt from: ktechmidas PR: dashpay/grovedb#378 File: .github/workflows/release-crates.yml:34-34 Timestamp: 2025-06-06T06:13:27.562Z Learning: The crate `grovedbg-types` is a valid crate name in the GroveDB project, not a typo of `grovedb-types`.merk/src/tree/link.rs (1)
283-285: LGTM! Consistent encoding/decoding for ProvableCount variant.The changes correctly extend the Link serialization to support
AggregateData::ProvableCount:
- Uses discriminator byte 5 (next available)
- Consistent varint encoding/decoding like Count variant
- Proper cost calculations matching other single-value variants
Also applies to: 320-322, 390-393, 450-453, 483-486, 559-562
grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_query_tree.rs (1)
3-102: Good test coverage for nested tree queries in ProvableCountTree.Unlike the other debug tests, this is a well-structured integration test with proper assertions. It effectively tests querying nested trees within a ProvableCountTree and verifies both the root hash and returned elements.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs (3)
9-73: LGTM!Well-structured test that properly validates basic provable count tree operations and root hash changes.
76-142: LGTM!Comprehensive test for provable count tree proof generation and verification.
244-313: LGTM!Thorough test for provable count trees with subtrees, including proper proof verification and root hash validation.
merk/src/proofs/tree.rs (3)
15-23: LGTM!Necessary imports for provable count tree support.
52-52: LGTM!Correctly handles KVCount nodes by extracting count as aggregate data.
123-170: LGTM!Correctly implements count-aware hashing for provable count tree nodes. The special handling for
ProvableCountedMerkNodefeature type and the newKVCount/KVHashCountvariants properly integrate count values into the hash computation.merk/src/proofs/encoding.rs (5)
76-90: LGTM!Encoding implementation for KVCount and KVHashCount nodes follows established patterns and correctly serializes all fields.
153-167: LGTM!PushInverted encoding for count nodes is consistent with Push encoding.
190-212: LGTM!Encoding length calculations correctly account for all fields in the count node variants.
385-424: LGTM!Decoding implementation correctly reverses the encoding process and properly constructs the count node variants.
1088-1169: LGTM!Comprehensive test coverage for count node encoding/decoding, including round-trip verification and decoder iteration.
grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs (1)
11-39: Extensive debug module additions for ProvableCountTree testingThe addition of numerous debug modules (24 new modules) suggests thorough investigation and testing of the ProvableCountTree feature. This is excellent for ensuring robustness, but consider:
- Organization: Consider grouping related debug modules into subdirectories for better maintainability
- Cleanup: Ensure debug modules that are no longer needed are removed before final release
- Documentation: Add module-level documentation explaining the purpose of each debug module
The comprehensive test coverage is commendable and should help identify edge cases in the ProvableCountTree implementation.
merk/src/tree/mod.rs (8)
48-51: LGTM! Import addition is appropriate.The addition of
node_hash_with_countto the public exports is necessary for the new ProvableCountTree functionality.
78-78: Import addition looks good.Adding
TreeTypeto the use statement is required for the newhash_for_linkmethod implementation.
467-467: Consistent implementation for ProvableCount.The size calculation for
ProvableCountcorrectly follows the same pattern as other count-based aggregate data types.
519-519: Correct handling of ProvableCount in aggregate data methods.The implementation appropriately returns:
- 0 for sum-related methods (as ProvableCount has no sum component)
- The count value for count-related methods
Also applies to: 536-536, 553-553
570-594: Well-designed hash computation for ProvableCountTree.The
hash_for_linkmethod correctly implements special hash computation that includes the count value for ProvableCountTree nodes, ensuring cryptographic commitment to the count.
644-652: Correct aggregate count calculation for ProvableCountedMerkNode.The implementation properly sums the node's count with its children's counts using checked arithmetic to prevent overflow.
1073-1083: Proper hash computation during commit for ProvableCount nodes.The commit method correctly uses
node_hash_with_countfor nodes with ProvableCount aggregate data, ensuring the count is included in the cryptographic hash during tree commits.Also applies to: 1107-1116
1194-1198: Good test organization.Adding separate test modules for provable count functionality and edge cases promotes good test organization and coverage.
grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_comprehensive_test.rs (1)
1-709: Excellent test coverage for ProvableCountTree functionality!The test suite comprehensively covers:
- Hash computation with count changes
- Proof generation and verification with count nodes
- Batch operations
- Deletion behavior
- Various query types (range, limited, conditional)
- Edge cases (empty trees)
All tests are well-structured with clear setup, execution, and meaningful assertions.
merk/src/tree/tree_feature_type.rs (8)
40-42: Consistent enum variant additions.The new
ProvableCountedMerkNodeandProvableCountvariants correctly follow the pattern of existing count-based variants with appropriate u64 storage.Also applies to: 66-67
53-53: Correct node type mapping.The
ProvableCountedMerkNodecorrectly maps toNodeType::ProvableCountNode.
78-79: Correct implementation of AggregateData methods for ProvableCount.The methods correctly handle
ProvableCount:
- Maps to
TreeType::ProvableCountTree- Returns 0 for sum-related methods (no sum component)
- Returns the count value for count retrieval
Also applies to: 96-97, 107-108, 118-119
132-133: Correct trait implementation.The
From<TreeFeatureType>implementation properly convertsProvableCountedMerkNodetoAggregateData::ProvableCount.
157-161: Consistent cost calculation.The
ProvableCountedMerkNodecorrectly uses the same cost type and length calculation as other count-based nodes.
173-173: Appropriate encoding cost.The encoding cost of 9 bytes for
ProvableCountedMerkNodeis correct and consistent with other single-value variants.
211-216: Correct encoding implementation.The encoding properly uses discriminant byte
[5]and varint encoding for the count, consistent with other variants.
241-246: Correct encoding length and decode implementations.Both methods properly handle the
ProvableCountedMerkNodevariant with correct length calculation and decoding logic.Also applies to: 276-279
grovedb/src/element/helpers.rs (8)
57-59: Correct count value retrieval.The
count_value_or_defaultmethod properly handlesProvableCountTreeby returning its count value.
71-71: Correct count-sum tuple for ProvableCountTree.Returns
(count_value, 0)appropriately sinceProvableCountTreehas no sum component.
168-171: Consistent tree type mapping.Both
root_key_and_tree_type_ownedandroot_key_and_tree_typecorrectly mapProvableCountTreetoTreeType::ProvableCountTree.Also applies to: 185-188
201-201: Comprehensive tree helper method updates.All tree-related helper methods correctly handle
ProvableCountTree:
- Proper tree type identification
- Correct feature type creation
- Appropriate flag handling
Also applies to: 215-215, 230-232, 246-246, 273-273
313-316: Correct feature type generation.The method properly generates
ProvableCountedMerkNodewith the count value forProvableCountTreeparent type.
331-331: Consistent flag handling for ProvableCountTree.All flag-related methods (
get_flags,get_flags_owned,get_flags_mut,set_flags) properly includeProvableCountTree.Also applies to: 347-347, 363-363, 379-379
501-511: Appropriate cost calculation for ProvableCountTree.Correctly uses
COUNT_TREE_COST_SIZEsinceProvableCountTreehas the same storage requirements asCountTree.
540-540: Consistent cost handling.Both
get_specialized_costandvalue_defined_costcorrectly handleProvableCountTreewith appropriate cost values and types.Also applies to: 563-563
| // Create a regular tree at root (not provable count) | ||
| let tree_key = b"accounts"; | ||
| db.insert::<&[u8], _>( | ||
| &[], | ||
| tree_key, | ||
| Element::empty_tree(), | ||
| None, | ||
| None, | ||
| grove_version, | ||
| ) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .expect("should insert tree"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Clarify test scope - uses regular tree, not ProvableCountTree.
The test creates a regular tree (Element::empty_tree()) rather than a ProvableCountTree, which seems inconsistent with the filename debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs. Consider clarifying the test's purpose or updating the filename to match the actual test behavior.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this test should be using ProvableCountTree instead
# Expected: Find other similar tests to understand the intended pattern
# Look for other alice-related tests
fd "alice" --type f --extension rs
# Search for tests that use ProvableCountTree
rg -A 3 -B 3 "Element::empty_provable_count_tree\(\)" --type rustLength of output: 20578
Align test filename with implementation or switch to a ProvableCountTree
This test (debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs, lines 8–19) creates a plain tree via Element::empty_tree() but lives under the debug_provable_count_* suite where every other test uses Element::empty_provable_count_tree(). You have two options:
• Rename the test to reflect that it’s exercising a regular tree (e.g. debug_direct_alice.rs), or
• Change the insertion to use a ProvableCountTree (Element::empty_provable_count_tree()) so the filename matches the behavior.
Affected location:
// grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs:L8–19
let tree_key = b"accounts";
db.insert::<&[u8], _>(
&[],
tree_key,
Element::empty_tree(), // ← replace with empty_provable_count_tree() if you intend to test provable counts
None,
None,
grove_version,
)
.unwrap()
.expect("should insert tree");🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In grovedb/src/tests/debug_provable_count_alice_direct.rs around lines 8 to 19,
the test inserts a regular tree using Element::empty_tree() but the filename and
test suite imply it should be testing a provable count tree. To fix this, either
rename the test file and related identifiers to reflect it is testing a regular
tree, or change the insertion call to use Element::empty_provable_count_tree()
instead of Element::empty_tree() so the test behavior matches the filename and
suite expectations.
| // Verify the OLD proof should now fail because the reference target changed | ||
| // However, this might not fail because proofs are self-contained and don't | ||
| // check if reference targets have changed after proof generation | ||
| let verify_result = GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version); | ||
| println!( | ||
| "Verify result after changing reference target: {:?}", | ||
| verify_result | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| assert!(matches!( | ||
| GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version), | ||
| Err(_) | ||
| )); | ||
| // For now, let's check if it returns Ok (which would indicate the proof | ||
| // system doesn't detect reference target changes) | ||
| if verify_result.is_ok() { | ||
| // This is actually expected behavior - proofs are self-contained | ||
| // and don't require database access during verification | ||
| println!("WARNING: Proof verification passed even though reference target changed"); | ||
| println!( | ||
| "This is because proofs include the referenced value at proof generation time" | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Skip this assertion as it's based on incorrect assumptions | ||
| // about how proof verification works | ||
| } else { | ||
| // If it does fail, that would be surprising | ||
| panic!("Unexpected: Proof verification failed when reference target changed"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test clarity and remove debugging output
The test modification adds extensive debugging output and comments that explain proof verification behavior. While the educational content is valuable, consider these improvements:
- // Verify the OLD proof should now fail because the reference target changed
- // However, this might not fail because proofs are self-contained and don't
- // check if reference targets have changed after proof generation
- let verify_result = GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version);
- println!(
- "Verify result after changing reference target: {:?}",
- verify_result
- );
-
- // For now, let's check if it returns Ok (which would indicate the proof
- // system doesn't detect reference target changes)
- if verify_result.is_ok() {
- // This is actually expected behavior - proofs are self-contained
- // and don't require database access during verification
- println!("WARNING: Proof verification passed even though reference target changed");
- println!(
- "This is because proofs include the referenced value at proof generation time"
- );
-
- // Skip this assertion as it's based on incorrect assumptions
- // about how proof verification works
- } else {
- // If it does fail, that would be surprising
- panic!("Unexpected: Proof verification failed when reference target changed");
- }
+ // Verify the proof should still pass because proofs are self-contained
+ // and include referenced values at proof generation time
+ let verify_result = GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version);
+ assert!(verify_result.is_ok(),
+ "Proof verification should pass as proofs include referenced values");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Verify the OLD proof should now fail because the reference target changed | |
| // However, this might not fail because proofs are self-contained and don't | |
| // check if reference targets have changed after proof generation | |
| let verify_result = GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version); | |
| println!( | |
| "Verify result after changing reference target: {:?}", | |
| verify_result | |
| ); | |
| assert!(matches!( | |
| GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version), | |
| Err(_) | |
| )); | |
| // For now, let's check if it returns Ok (which would indicate the proof | |
| // system doesn't detect reference target changes) | |
| if verify_result.is_ok() { | |
| // This is actually expected behavior - proofs are self-contained | |
| // and don't require database access during verification | |
| println!("WARNING: Proof verification passed even though reference target changed"); | |
| println!( | |
| "This is because proofs include the referenced value at proof generation time" | |
| ); | |
| // Skip this assertion as it's based on incorrect assumptions | |
| // about how proof verification works | |
| } else { | |
| // If it does fail, that would be surprising | |
| panic!("Unexpected: Proof verification failed when reference target changed"); | |
| } | |
| // Verify the proof should still pass because proofs are self-contained | |
| // and include referenced values at proof generation time | |
| let verify_result = GroveDb::verify_query(&proof, &query, grove_version); | |
| assert!(verify_result.is_ok(), | |
| "Proof verification should pass as proofs include referenced values"); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In grovedb/src/tests/mod.rs around lines 4044 to 4068, the test includes
excessive debugging print statements and verbose comments explaining proof
verification behavior. To improve clarity and maintain test cleanliness, remove
the println! debugging outputs and condense the comments to concise
explanations. Keep the test focused on asserting expected behavior without extra
runtime output.
| let root_hash1 = db | ||
| .root_hash(None, grove_version) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .expect("should get root hash"); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused variable
The variable root_hash1 is computed but never used in the test.
- // Get root hashes - they should be different even with same content
- let root_hash1 = db
- .root_hash(None, grove_version)
- .unwrap()
- .expect("should get root hash");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let root_hash1 = db | |
| .root_hash(None, grove_version) | |
| .unwrap() | |
| .expect("should get root hash"); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In grovedb/src/tests/provable_count_tree_test.rs around lines 204 to 208, the
variable root_hash1 is assigned a value but never used afterwards. Remove the
declaration and assignment of root_hash1 to clean up the code and avoid unused
variable warnings.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation