Skip to content

Conversation

@faithebear
Copy link
Contributor

What are you changing in this pull request and why?

PR 69 is closed : dbt-labs/dbt-fusion#69

And this docs page exists: https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/build/udfs#defining-udfs-in-dbt

Looks like UDFs are supported in Fusion now? Can we delete them from this "when to turn off static analysis" page?

Checklist

PR 69 is closed : dbt-labs/dbt-fusion#69 

And this docs page exists: https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/build/udfs#defining-udfs-in-dbt 

Looks like UDFs are supported in Fusion now? Can we delete them from this "when to turn off static analysis" page?
@faithebear faithebear requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2026 20:10
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 9, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs-getdbt-com Ready Ready Preview Feb 9, 2026 8:13pm

Request Review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the content Improvements or additions to content label Feb 9, 2026
@luna-bianca
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening this PR, @faithebear !

@luna-bianca luna-bianca merged commit ff0e53f into current Feb 10, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@luna-bianca luna-bianca deleted the delete_udfs_static_analysis branch February 10, 2026 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

content Improvements or additions to content

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add ability to define UDFs so that models that use them can be compiled

2 participants