Skip to content

Conversation

@RanaBug
Copy link
Contributor

@RanaBug RanaBug commented Jun 4, 2025

Description

  • SendOptions to allow to retry send with high gas fee if fee is too low error

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Existing Unit Tests and Manual Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for an optional retry mechanism when sending transactions, allowing automatic retries with increased gas fees if initial fees are too low.
    • Introduced new options to customize retry behavior, including maximum retries and fee multipliers.
  • Chores

    • Updated documentation and versioning to reflect the new release.

@RanaBug RanaBug requested review from IAmKio and vignesha22 June 4, 2025 15:42
@RanaBug RanaBug self-assigned this Jun 4, 2025
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jun 4, 2025

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Error: Could not generate a valid Mermaid diagram after multiple attempts.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-06-04T15_43_31_921Z-debug-0.log

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/types/EtherspotTransactionKit.ts (1)

205-209: Well-designed type definition for retry options.

The SendOptions type is well-structured with appropriate optional properties. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document expected value ranges and behavior, especially for maxRetries and feeMultiplier.

Consider adding JSDoc documentation:

+/**
+ * Options for configuring transaction sending behavior
+ */
 export type SendOptions = {
+  /** Enable retry mechanism when transaction fails due to low fees */
   retryOnFeeTooLow?: boolean;
+  /** Maximum number of retry attempts (should be positive) */
   maxRetries?: number;
+  /** Fee multiplier for retries (should be > 1.0) */
   feeMultiplier?: number;
 };
CHANGELOG.md (1)

7-7: Fix typo in changelog entry.

There's a typo in the changelog description: "useOp.maxFeePerGas" should be "userOp.maxFeePerGas" to match standard UserOperation naming conventions.

Apply this fix:

-- Added `SendOptions` to the `send()` function, allowing an optional retry mechanism if the `useOp.maxFeePerGas` and `userOp.maxPriorityFeePerGas` are too low.
+- Added `SendOptions` to the `send()` function, allowing an optional retry mechanism if the `userOp.maxFeePerGas` and `userOp.maxPriorityFeePerGas` are too low.
src/providers/EtherspotTransactionKitContextProvider.tsx (2)

219-231: Extract duplicated fee multiplier calculation.

The conversion of feeMultiplier to BigInt is duplicated. Consider extracting it to improve maintainability.

             attempt++;
+            const feeMultiplierBigInt = BigInt(Math.floor(feeMultiplier * 100));
+            
             const maxFee = BigInt(userOp.maxFeePerGas.toString());
-            const maxFeeMultiplier = BigInt(Math.floor(feeMultiplier * 100));
-            const maxNewFee = (maxFee * maxFeeMultiplier) / BigInt(100);
+            const maxNewFee = (maxFee * feeMultiplierBigInt) / BigInt(100);

             const maxPriorityFee = BigInt(
               userOp.maxPriorityFeePerGas.toString()
             );
-            const maxFeePriorityMultiplier = BigInt(
-              Math.floor(feeMultiplier * 100)
-            );
             const maxPriorityNewFee =
-              (maxPriorityFee * maxFeePriorityMultiplier) / BigInt(100);
+              (maxPriorityFee * feeMultiplierBigInt) / BigInt(100);

210-210:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Consider more robust error detection.

The current implementation relies on string matching for error detection. If the SDK provides error codes or specific error types, consider using those for more reliable error detection.

Let me check if the SDK provides more structured error information:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in the SDK usage
rg -A 5 "getUserOpReceipt|send\(" --type ts | grep -E "(error|Error|catch)" -A 3

Length of output: 1272


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate the definition of parseEtherspotErrorMessage to inspect its implementation
rg -n "parseEtherspotErrorMessage" -A10

Length of output: 4163


Consider using structured SDK error codes instead of string matching

Relying on errorMessage.includes('fee too low') is fragile. If the Etherspot SDK exposes error codes (e.g. error.code or custom error classes), switch to checking those for more reliable detection.

• src/providers/EtherspotTransactionKitContextProvider.tsx (around line 210)
• Suggested update:

- const isFeeTooLow = errorMessage.includes('fee too low');
+ // TODO: replace substring match with SDK‐provided error code, e.g. error.code === 'FEE_TOO_LOW'
+ const isFeeTooLow = errorMessage.includes('fee too low');

Please verify in the SDK documentation whether such codes or types exist and adjust accordingly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcc2677 and 1f4d49e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • example/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/contexts/EtherspotTransactionKitContext.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/providers/EtherspotTransactionKitContextProvider.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/types/EtherspotTransactionKit.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/contexts/EtherspotTransactionKitContext.tsx (1)
src/types/EtherspotTransactionKit.ts (2)
  • SendOptions (205-209)
  • ISentBatches (53-55)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (1)

4-4: Appropriate semantic version bump.

The patch version increment from "1.1.0" to "1.1.1" is correct for this backward-compatible feature addition.

src/contexts/EtherspotTransactionKitContext.tsx (2)

8-8: Correct import addition for SendOptions type.

The import statement properly includes the new SendOptions type.


17-20: Well-implemented interface update maintaining backward compatibility.

The send method signature update correctly adds the optional SendOptions parameter while preserving existing functionality. The parameter is properly typed and optional, ensuring backward compatibility.

src/providers/EtherspotTransactionKitContextProvider.tsx (2)

156-164: Good implementation of backward-compatible API enhancement.

The optional options parameter with sensible defaults ensures existing code continues to work while enabling the new retry functionality when needed.


270-271: Clean integration of retry logic.

Good abstraction of the retry logic into a separate function while maintaining the existing error handling flow.

}
}

throw new Error('Failed to send after retries.');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Misleading error message.

This error message will only be reached when retrying due to "fee too low" errors. Consider making it more specific.

-      throw new Error('Failed to send after retries.');
+      throw new Error(`Failed to send after ${maxRetries} retries with fee adjustments.`);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
throw new Error('Failed to send after retries.');
throw new Error(`Failed to send after ${maxRetries} retries with fee adjustments.`);
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/providers/EtherspotTransactionKitContextProvider.tsx at line 243, the
error message "Failed to send after retries." is too generic and misleading
because it only occurs after retries due to "fee too low" errors. Update the
error message to specifically mention that the failure is due to repeated "fee
too low" errors to provide clearer context.

Copy link
Contributor

@IAmKio IAmKio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@vignesha22 vignesha22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@RanaBug RanaBug merged commit 12a6bd1 into master Jun 4, 2025
5 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 14, 2025
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants