Skip to content

fatihwf/AstroData-Testing-Pipeline

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

8 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AstroData-Testing-Pipeline: A Multi-Stage Cosmological Data Analysis Pipeline

Python License AstroPhysics

An advanced computational framework for testing fundamental cosmological hypotheses using multi-messenger open data (CMB, Supernovae, Gravitational Waves, and LHC Open Data).

Project Overview

This project implements a robust statistical and computational pipeline to evaluate the limits of the Standard Cosmological Model (ΛCDM) against alternative theories such as Dynamic Dark Energy, Extra-Dimensional Gravity, and Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC).

Technical Stack

  • Physical Engines: CAMB (Einstein-Boltzmann solver), PyCBC (Gravitational wave informatics).
  • Data Processing: Healpy (HEALPix spherical mapping), Uproot & Awkward (ROOT file processing), Pandas, NumPy.
  • Statistical Inference: Emcee (MCMC), SciPy (Optimization), Akaike/Bayesian Information Criteria (AIC/BIC).

Analysis Stages

Stage 1: Dynamic Dark Energy Model Selection

Scientific Goal: Testing for deviations from the cosmological constant (Λ) using a dynamic Equation of State parameter (Γ).

  • Dataset: Pantheon+ (1590 Type Ia Supernovae) & SDSS DR12 BAO.
  • Methodology: Bayesian inference via MCMC with analytical marginalization over M_B.

Stage 2: Multi-Messenger Gravity Leakage Test

Scientific Goal: Constraining the "leakage" of gravitational waves into extra dimensions.

  • Dataset: LIGO GW150914 Strain Data + SN + BAO.
  • Methodology: Waveform damping analysis and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) consistency checks via joint MCMC.

Stage 3: LHC High-Energy MET Anomaly Detection

Scientific Goal: Searching for Missing Transverse Energy (MET) as a proxy for extra-dimensional particle decay.

  • Dataset: CERN ATLAS 13 TeV Monojet Open Data.
  • Methodology: High-dimensional phase-space analysis and background estimation using ROOT/Uproot.

Stage 4: Primordial Power Spectrum Dynamics

Scientific Goal: Modeling early universe leakage by adjusting the effective number of relativistic species (N_eff) and Dynamic Dark Energy.

  • Methodology: Acoustic peak simulation utilizing the CAMB Boltzmann solver.

Stage 5: Holographic Universe vs. Standard Inflation

Scientific Goal: Evaluating the 2D Holographic QFT Power Spectrum against 3D Inflation.

  • Dataset: Planck 2018 CMB (TT Spectrum).
  • Methodology: Custom P(k) injection into CAMB and reduced χ²_ν optimization via Nelder-Mead.

Stage 6: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (Hawking Points Search)

Scientific Goal: Searching for concentric rings of low variance in the CMB as remnants of a previous Aeon.

  • Dataset: Planck 2018 SMICA Full-Sky Map.
  • Methodology: Spherical image processing (HEALPix), radial autocorrelation, and rigorous Monte Carlo Look-Elsewhere Effect (LEE) / Bonferroni corrections.

Results & Visualization

Stage Hypothesis Tested Finding Statistical Significance
Stage 1 Dynamic Dark Energy ΛCDM Preferred ΔBIC > 10
Stage 2 Extra-Dimensional Leakage No Leakage Detected η ≈ 0
Stage 3 LHC MET Anomaly Consistent with SM No 5σ excess
Stage 5 Holographic QFT Competitive Fit χ²_ν ≈ 1.13
Stage 6 CCC Hawking Points No Signal Detected 1.7σ (Noise consistent)

Overall Conclusion: Across all stages of this multi-messenger analysis, the Standard Cosmological Model (ΛCDM) and the Standard Model of Particle Physics consistently emerged as the statistically preferred frameworks. Despite rigorous testing of advanced alternative theories—including dynamic dark energy, extra-dimensional gravity leakage, and conformal cyclic cosmology—no significant anomalies (e.g., ≥ 5σ excesses or strong Bayesian preference) were detected. The data firmly reinforces the robust predictive power of the Standard Model.

Sample Outputs

1. MCMC Parameter Estimation (Dark Energy Analysis) MCMC Corner Plot
Figure 1: Posterior distributions for dynamic dark energy model parameters.

2. Holographic Universe vs. Standard Inflation Holographic CMB
Figure 2: Planck 2018 TT Power Spectrum fit against Afshordi QFT model and ΛCDM.

3. Concentric Ring Variance Analysis (Conformal Cyclic Cosmology) Penrose Rings
Figure 3: Hawking Point search on Planck SMICA map with Monte Carlo LEE correction.


Installation

git clone [https://github.com/fatihwf/AstroData-Testing-Pipeline.git](https://github.com/fatihwf/AstroData-Testing-Pipeline.git)
cd AstroData-Testing-Pipeline
pip install -r requirements.txt

License

Distributed under the MIT License. See LICENSE for more information.

📜 Citation

If you use this framework or data pipeline in your research or projects, please cite it as follows:

@misc{Goc2026Cosmo,
  author = {Fatih Gazi Göç},
  title = {AstroData-Testing-Pipeline: A Multi-Stage Cosmological Data Analysis Pipeline},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {GitHub},
  journal = {GitHub Repository},
  howpublished = {\url{[https://github.com/fatihwf/AstroData-Testing-Pipeline](https://github.com/fatihwf/AstroData-Testing-Pipeline)}}
}

About

Bayesian MCMC cosmology pipeline: dynamic dark energy (w0-wa) vs ΛCDM using Pantheon+ SNe Ia & SDSS DR12 BAO. Full covariance matrix, Planck 2018 r_d prior, AIC/BIC model selection. Python | emcee | camb | astropy

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors