Add ability to skip routing on a particular setRoute() call.

[andyburke]

I'm submitting this pull request even though I'm not sure it's the proper solution. I'd like to be able to set the route without triggering routing in a specific case. I don't see any better way to accomplish that, but I'm open to suggestions on how this code could be improved.

As it stands, this code is fulfilling my need. I can do:

setRoute( someRoute, true );

and routing will not fire for that particular setRoute() call.

Please let me know what you think of this change.

[andyburke]

Any word on this? Is there something that doesn't meet your requirements for this patch? I'm willing to work with you on modifications.

[captn3m0]

👍 to this.

[ranadeep47]

+1

[iby]

+1

[adammiller]

+1. Surprised this isn't already supported.

[bvandorn]

+1: I can see a less intrusive option being to call a skipNextRoute() method as a less intrusive alternative

[ingro]

That would be very nice!