Skip to content

Conversation

@Kreshnik
Copy link

@Kreshnik Kreshnik commented Nov 8, 2025

Fix a small typo

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Kreshnik, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a small but important typo in the multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb example notebook. The change ensures that the documentation is grammatically correct, enhancing readability and professionalism for users engaging with the multi-spectral remote sensing example.

Highlights

  • Typo Correction: A minor grammatical error has been fixed in the multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb notebook, changing 'iamges' to 'images'.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:examples Issues/PR referencing examples folder labels Nov 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a typo in a markdown header within the multi_spectral_remote_sensing.ipynb notebook. The change is accurate and improves the document's clarity. While this change is good to merge, I noticed a few opportunities for improvement to align the notebook with the repository's style guide. Specifically, several code cells have non-null execution_count values, which suggests the notebook formatting script may need to be run. Additionally, some multi-line strings and long lines of code do not follow the prescribed formatting. These items are outside the scope of this small fix but could be addressed in a future pull request to enhance consistency across the codebase.

@chunduriv chunduriv self-assigned this Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component:examples Issues/PR referencing examples folder status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants