IBX-9513: Fixed obsolete ibexa_content Controller references
#56
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This was referenced Feb 7, 2025
konradoboza
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2025
adamwojs
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2025
konradoboza
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2025
tomaszszopinski
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2025
10 tasks
|
Note: CI fails on main too, related to another bug. |
Steveb-p
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related PRs:
ibexa_*Controller references core#474Description:
Fixed single colon controller references, which seem to be no longer working in Symfony 6.
Note: we have behat failures for http cache fetatures and REST integration tests failures, which need to be handled separately.
For QA:
The bug might be reproducible in a similar form to the one from JIRA ticket, when using HTTP cache (e.g. Varnish). Not 100% sure however, just a guess. If so, affected field types: