Skip to content

Conversation

@MaximilianAlgehed
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed commented Sep 4, 2025

closes #30

The idea here is that instead of having a bunch of special cases to deal with different configurations of x == E[x'] we generalize to propagating both backwards and forwards across E[x] == E'[x'], thus unifying previous cases and allowing many more specs to simply work out.

@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2025 06:43
@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed changed the title add failing tests More sensible back propagation Sep 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Lucsanszky Lucsanszky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have only found a minor typo so far but I will be keep reviewing tomorrow with a fresh pair of eyes.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lucsanszky Lucsanszky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not that familiar with the codebase to confidently approve this, but nonetheless I'll approve in case you are eager to merge. However, it would be good if @Soupstraw could review this too once he is back from his vacation.

@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed enabled auto-merge (squash) September 30, 2025 11:41
@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed merged commit 4ccd6b0 into master Sep 30, 2025
8 checks passed
@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed deleted the cant-backpropagation branch September 30, 2025 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve back-propagation for pairs

4 participants