Bump setup-node action to v4
#729
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Hello @cbnuLeehyunwoo. Lets upgrade to v4 of action now. We shall consider downgrading if and when some issue props up in the future. |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the review! @ashmaroli |
cbnuLeehyunwoo
changed the title
cbnuLeehyunwoo
changed the title
ashmaroli
changed the title
setup-node action to v4
Member
|
Thank you @cbnuLeehyunwoo |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the CI workflow to use actions/setup-node@v3 instead of v2, as a preventive measure against potential cache restore failures.
While no error has occurred yet, recent changes in GitHub Actions caching infrastructure suggest that workflows relying on deprecated versions of actions/cache (used internally by setup-node@v2)
Relevant discussions:
actions/setup-node#1275
actions/toolkit/discussions/1890
if there’s a better approach or refinements needed, I’m happy to revise or close the PR as needed.
Thank you for your time and consideration!
Related Issue
Closes #728