Skip to content

Fix DomainError in docstring #50

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Fix DomainError in docstring #50

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

blegat
Copy link
Contributor

@blegat blegat commented Jun 15, 2025 

julia> @argcheck det(A) < 0 DomainError()
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching DomainError()
The type `DomainError` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types when trying to construct it.

Closest candidates are:
  DomainError(::Any, ::Any)
   @ Core boot.jl:356
  DomainError(::Any)
   @ Core boot.jl:355

Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope
   @ REPL[17]:1

julia> @argcheck det(A) < 0 DomainError
ERROR: DomainError with det(A) < 0 must hold. Got
det(A) => 0.0:

Stacktrace:
 [1] throw_check_error(info::Any)
   @ ArgCheck ~/.julia/packages/ArgCheck/DaoPJ/src/checks.jl:283
 [2] top-level scope
   @ REPL[18]:1

@blegat
Fix DomainError in docstring
199d857 
```julia
julia> @argcheck det(A) < 0 DomainError()
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching DomainError()
The type `DomainError` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types when trying to construct it.

Closest candidates are:
  DomainError(::Any, ::Any)
   @ Core boot.jl:356
  DomainError(::Any)
   @ Core boot.jl:355

Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope
   @ REPL[17]:1

julia> @argcheck det(A) < 0 DomainError
ERROR: DomainError with det(A) < 0 must hold. Got
det(A) => 0.0:

Stacktrace:
 [1] throw_check_error(info::Any)
   @ ArgCheck ~/.julia/packages/ArgCheck/DaoPJ/src/checks.jl:283
 [2] top-level scope
   @ REPL[18]:1
```
@jw3126 jw3126 merged commit 4d525ec into jw3126:master Jun 16, 2025
7 checks passed
@jw3126 jw3126 mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@blegat @jw3126