Skip to content

Fix typos #587

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
vrom911 merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

Fix typos #587

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/Chapter4.hs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ class Functor f => Applicative f where
Wow, that's a lot going on again! Where did all these scary creatures
come? But if we look closer, it all looks a bit familiar already.

We now can spot straightaway, that similar to Functors, only types
We now can spot straight away, that similar to Functors, only types
with kind `* -> *` can have an Applicative instance (e.g. Maybe, and
not 'Int' or 'Char'), as we see the same 'f a' argument in the
methods' types.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion test/Test/Chapter4.hs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ chapter4normal :: Spec
chapter4normal = describe "Chapter4Normal" $ do
describe "Task2: Functor for Secret" $ do
let trap = Trap "it's a trap"
it "doen't affect trap" $
it "doesn't affect trap" $
fmap @(Secret String) @Bool not trap `shouldBe` trap
it "change reward, same type" $
fmap @(Secret String) @Bool not (Reward False) `shouldBe` Reward True
Expand Down
Loading