Skip to content

bug: IsExplicitlyRequestingTAS ignores PodsetSliceRequiredTopologyConstraints#10063

Open
Huang-Wei wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Huang-Wei:tas-multi-layer-bug
Open

bug: IsExplicitlyRequestingTAS ignores PodsetSliceRequiredTopologyConstraints#10063
Huang-Wei wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Huang-Wei:tas-multi-layer-bug

Conversation

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/area tas

What this PR does / why we need it:

When only podset-slice-required-topology-constraints annotation is set, IsExplicitlyRequestingTAS() returns false, and hence multi-layer topology request will be silently ignored in non-TAS-only ClusterQueues.

In reality this is a corner case b/c we usually set the top-level podset-required-topology to "datacenter" or other topology, which evaluates IsExplicitlyRequestingTAS() to true. But we'd better not make that assumption.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #9046

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

…straints

When only podset-slice-required-topology-constraints annotation is set,
IsExplicitlyRequestingTAS returns false, causing multi-layer topology
requests to be silently ignored in non-TAS-only ClusterQueues.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. area/tas Topology-Aware Scheduling labels Mar 21, 2026
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 21, 2026

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2cd235d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/69be000051b6580008138933
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10063--kubernetes-sigs-kueue.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Huang-Wei
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mbobrovskyi, pbundyra, tenzen-y for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from kannon92 and pajakd March 21, 2026 02:18
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 21, 2026
@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @mimowo @tenzen-y

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/tas Topology-Aware Scheduling cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants