paper(schema-bound-tokens): reconcile §4.1 tau_burn with tokenomics schedule

[proofmancer]

Summary

Resolves the one item the consistency re-audit (#169) flagged for author decision: schema-bound-tokens §4.1 cited "recommended τ_burn ∈ [0.3, 0.5]," contradicting the canonical AVOW Tokenomics §7 schedule {0.60, 0.40, 0.25} and themisra-licensing's 0.25 burn share.

The fix

The §4.1 bound is explicitly qualitative (the paper defers the precise parameterized version to v0.3 pending devnet data, line 167) and used a transparent 100×τ_burn mapping (0.3→30, 0.5→50). So this re-anchors to the correct τ_burn values rather than redoing a derivation:

• §4.1 (line 163): τ_burn ∈ [0.3, 0.5] → "AVOW Tokenomics §7 schedule (steady-state 0.25, rising to 0.60 during bootstrap)"; the bound now states the binding steady-state case at ~25× (τ_burn = 0.25), noting bootstrap phases only loosen it.
• §4.1 (line 165): "~30-50×" → "~25× at steady state (margin widens during bootstrap)".

This is strictly more correct, not just consistent: the old "30-50×" overstated the steady-state margin (steady-state τ_burn is 0.25, below the old band's floor). The v0.3 precise-bound deferral is unchanged.

Also

CONSISTENCY_REVIEW.md §5 flipped from "flagged for author decision" → "resolved"; summary block + §7 open-items updated to match.

Test plan

• check_citations.py passes (102 citations)
• SBT PDF rebuilds clean
• No [0.3, 0.5] or "30 to 50" strings remain in SBT (verified)
• No em dashes