[WIP] Updated Matcalc Benchmark PBE with new references #9
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
In our previous study, we used the relaxed geometries and formation energies of randomly sampled WBM structures—computed with PBE PAW dataset version 52—as our equilibrium benchmarking data. Since the MatPES dataset employs the newer PBE PAW dataset version 64 and the perturbation logic of
pymatgenrecently changes , we have now re-relaxed all geometries and recomputed formation energies using theMatPESStaticSettingtogether with the MatPES-PBE elemental references. We then reran the equilibrium benchmarking and updated the resulting statistics to ensure full consistency across training datasets.The basic idea here is:
Fingerprint distance:
All perturbations were applied using the latest version of pymatgen.
Formation energy:
The new EquilibriumBenchmark method in MatCalc will be updated soon.
Major changes:
Todos
If this is work in progress, what else needs to be done?
Checklist
ruff.mypy.duecredit@due.dcitedecorators to reference relevant papers by DOI (example)Tip: Install
pre-commithooks to auto-check types and linting before every commit: