Repository navigation
chore(main): release rea-agents 6.5.0 - #1693
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2223e4150a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **web:** retain capture read cleanup through export ([95a77b6](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/95a77b6e25420b3879bd0e32bdbb14d452b38776)) | ||
| * **website:** preserve template-owned HTML formatting ([e964a06](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e964a06b83c92c03551d29c1b7ecfa7db322cce2)) | ||
| * **windows:** load native controls in Node-API hosts not named node.exe ([#1531](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1531)) ([ea1c164](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ea1c164e5e056ddd2f6a220b11b3670d6c33ee0a)) | ||
| * **windows:** preserve drive-root private runtime paths ([ee46323](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ee46323b493994902b04824a7dc8aae2a8117903)), closes [#1690](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1690) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This Windows fix is already listed in the 6.4 section, and docs/releases/6.4.0.contributions.json records ee46323 as that release's target. In fact, the only commit between that target and this commit's parent is a56f7bb, the 6.4 release-metadata commit, yet the new 6.5 section repeats hundreds of 6.4 changes and breaking migrations. If this release is published, users will be told that already-shipped behavior is new in 6.5; wait for the 6.4 tag/baseline to be recognized and regenerate or discard this empty proposal.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
62d1a73 to
2bec739
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2bec739812
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ### Performance Improvements | ||
|
|
||
| * **mcp:** keep Playwright and type-only imports off MCP startup ([#1691](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1691)) ([0ecf3f2](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/0ecf3f2438ec96a6b543942869808018e8d84452)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When this release PR is merged, verifyNotesPublication will return its legacy result because docs/releases/6.5.0.contributions.json is absent, so the release can publish without the contributor checks used for 6.4. The only product contribution in this range, PR #1691, was authored by the previously verified contributor @kaoru0822-kitauji and closes #1685, but this bullet includes neither the required Thanks credit nor the closing-issue provenance. Generate the 6.5 inventory and finalize the notes before publishing so that attribution is retained and validated.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
3d3cd03 to
724d94a
Compare
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
ced1549 to
f245d22
Compare
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
9667f91 to
0546320
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0546320965
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **tests:** consolidate TypeScript dialect producer checks ([01762b1](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/01762b10c6a40370996e6dfa3a96ffcb27148f97)) | ||
| * **tests:** remove timed output and synchronize browser fixtures ([693ed33](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/693ed332b58d05192f55b8192d2c0c4bc4f4824a)) | ||
| * **tests:** reuse stateless workflows and immutable fixtures ([5f4c7ff](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/5f4c7ff6df0735d5a4461b5d0e6f2e466b888be0)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When this changelog is published, these three entries advertise package performance improvements even though their referenced commits modify only tests, test configuration, and testing documentation—not shipped runtime behavior. Omit them from the user-facing section and retain them only in the contribution provenance so the release notes describe actual product behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
0363582 to
e7edc9c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8facf0c4cc
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **update:** resolve Bun global directories before changing cwd ([e90acae](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e90acaea674f5f7f9f17ea472104afdc1422ada6)) | ||
| * **website:** clarify translated terminology and RTL flows ([a956275](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/a956275d8d0249c16dad282a3fb5d7da48fb2d6f)) | ||
| * **website:** incorporate multilingual contributor refinements ([d981a58](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d981a58d7f5344c3ab2117b6384aece4d1c35480)) | ||
| * **windows:** bring the real Windows Ghidra verifiers up to date ([#1863](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1863)) ([ea40f71](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ea40f717b26392000f989a8b500f6774b5e85091)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When these notes are published for 6.5.0, this entry presents a package bug fix, but commit ea40f71 changes only scripts/verify-packaged-ghidra-windows.mjs and scripts/verify-real-ghidra-windows.mjs; neither verifier is included in package.json#files or used by a shipped CLI/MCP path. Retain this internal verification maintenance in the contribution provenance rather than advertising it as shipped behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 23504bafe4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **hopper:** wait for late bridges during cleanup ([#1866](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1866)) ([cf7477e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf7477eb4642bc07228fa33ccc4c87656e6e3003)) | ||
| * **ida:** declare GUI navigation for attached legacy analysis ([#1764](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1764)) ([cf69207](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf692072b56903b60426e4b301b3c48fd31ee0fd)), closes [#1712](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1712) | ||
| * **ida:** report a procedure IDA cannot resolve as invalid input ([#1785](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1785)) ([d3e9ee5](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d3e9ee5505251f760666bb8e1e6c295b6d6aedb2)) | ||
| * **ida:** wait out a transient busy worker health in headless sessions ([#1778](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1778)) ([0bdc7a4](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/0bdc7a40ac171a05971b287f2aab0376e2f14358)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Linux headless users or other IDA versions and architectures, this presents the busy-health wait as a generally verified headless fix, but docs/testing.md:758-771 records the transient busy observation specifically on macOS arm64 with IDA Professional 9.1 and explicitly leaves Linux, other versions, and other architectures unverified. Qualify the entry with that real-provider scope rather than generalizing a single-host observation.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1c4ef59e93
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **hopper:** let failed one-shot commands exit while retaining a lease ([#1763](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1763)) ([e8528ce](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e8528cedcdfb1ca1d769304afdc353936e8e0d70)) | ||
| * **hopper:** preserve startup failures and recover denied launches ([069308b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/069308bbe6d73b1d87038b43c9121658325042a9)), closes [#1808](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1808) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For real macOS Hopper launches that encounter authorization/crash failures or incomplete cleanup, these entries present exit and recovery behavior without its verification limit. The e8528ce test replaces Hopper with a failing shell script, while the 069308b acceptance cases use hopperLaunchAdmission.mjs and other fixtures; the real-Hopper lane documents successful lifecycle coverage but does not induce these launch failures. State that the real macOS Hopper failure-and-retry paths remain unverified.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c62bfbc649
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **evaluation:** authenticate delivered Evidence citations ([844fa52](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/844fa52772c1533f7358a71a764da780503775a3)) | ||
| * **evidence:** normalize unknown revisions and preserve mutation intent ([#1733](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1733)) ([2165045](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/21650455a9c90a26e725c3505a3c17054cc4516c)), closes [#1723](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1723) [#1724](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1724) | ||
| * **evidence:** reject NUL bytes in subject and snapshot paths ([#1873](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1873)) ([fa9a7e5](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/fa9a7e5ec026c5a4e8426f0f36c2c4555be9c9f0)) | ||
| * **ghidra:** report progress while startup is pending ([#1877](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1877)) ([29d2624](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/29d2624b3475586356c27f518bf6b823030268fb)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users relying on progress to keep a long real Ghidra startup alive, this entry presents the behavior without its verification boundary. The added provider test uses FixtureLauncher, the MCP test emits progress from a recording provider, and docs/mcp-contracts.md explicitly says the recorded Windows run occurred before startup-waiting notifications were added; no real Ghidra CLI/MCP lane observes the new notifications. State that this path remains unverified with a real Ghidra startup.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **harmony:** project HarmonyOS package inventory evidence ([#1447](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1447)) ([f2150eb](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/f2150eb9a7ed76748238009ca6666efa52de5271)) | ||
| * **javascript:** recover code-split bundles from multiple inputs ([#1686](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1686)) ([12c4160](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/12c416005f9d2abf438f4df4447972424d781b65)) | ||
| * **native:** expose typed incoming references at exact addresses ([#1715](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1715)) ([cdd9fe7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cdd9fe716774c9e5abd121b70e9fd5e1eb91d2b8)) | ||
| * **update:** update Bun global installations ([#1735](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1735)) ([e4027e4](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4027e4afccc6316cd9cfc27c7b0427e66ceb91f)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users invoking rea update from an actual bun add --global installation, this advertises the capability without its validation boundary. The only process-level coverage substitutes a Node/shell recording executable named bun that fabricates bun info and bun add results without Bun or registry access, and no workflow exercises a real Bun-owned installation; qualify the entry so this simulation is not presented as verified Bun integration.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5cec967852
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **harmony:** project HarmonyOS package inventory evidence ([#1447](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1447)) ([f2150eb](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/f2150eb9a7ed76748238009ca6666efa52de5271)) | ||
| * **javascript:** recover code-split bundles from multiple inputs ([#1686](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1686)) ([12c4160](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/12c416005f9d2abf438f4df4447972424d781b65)) | ||
| * **native:** admit raw binaries with caller-supplied architecture and entry ([#1868](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1868)) ([7c207c7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7c207c79512f6baa70f4ed9d7d5334ab2d62f3ac)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Hopper, IDA, or Windows Ghidra P0 users, this native bullet advertises raw-binary admission even though docs/raw-binary.md:59-60 explicitly says those providers refuse it; moreover, docs/testing.md:796-802 records real-provider coverage only for an ARM little-endian image, with the other advertised CPU families covered by deterministic tests. Name the supported Ghidra boundary and disclose the narrower real-provider verification scope.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 956650c73f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **website:** add multilingual editions and translation workflow ([a2d3338](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/a2d3338e90a3a11385e2f63bedaa9750612f8719)) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ### Bug Fixes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The release commit's immediate parent is e4ac7bb / #1867, which changes shipped capability, provider, setup, browser, firmware, Mach-O, Evidence, and ASAR output ordering to be independent of host locale, but no entry in the 6.5.0 notes references that commit or PR. Include this user-visible determinism fix before publishing so the notes cover the complete release ancestry.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2a078cee89
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **evaluation:** authenticate delivered Evidence citations ([844fa52](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/844fa52772c1533f7358a71a764da780503775a3)) | ||
| * **evidence:** normalize unknown revisions and preserve mutation intent ([#1733](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1733)) ([2165045](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/21650455a9c90a26e725c3505a3c17054cc4516c)), closes [#1723](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1723) [#1724](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1724) | ||
| * **evidence:** reject NUL bytes in subject and snapshot paths ([#1873](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1873)) ([fa9a7e5](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/fa9a7e5ec026c5a4e8426f0f36c2c4555be9c9f0)) | ||
| * **firmware:** name missing extractor dependencies in partial extraction ([#1879](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1879)) ([1769417](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/176941700118cc33c86e07373cd6950f30548386)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users whose Unblob extraction reaches partial coverage because an external extractor is missing, this entry presents the normalized dependency and stage fields without their verification boundary. Commit 1769417 adds direct normalization cases and a fixture-backed integration assertion, but its validation record explicitly says real Unblob extraction was not verified; qualify the note rather than presenting fixture coverage as real-provider behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L44
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9ecd49a5d0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **apple:** validate build-version tool records within cmdsize ([#1784](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1784)) ([817aef4](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/817aef406861c2ce3f87ad3c912ea6c235bcdf12)) | ||
| * **artifacts:** count a changed partial-inventory root once ([#1854](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1854)) ([ee5275c](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ee5275cd9fae8db64f945a0c8b59e1c19ac402c3)), closes [#1844](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1844) | ||
| * **artifacts:** mark Windows host executables by extension ([#1823](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1823)) ([91f843b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/91f843bf38b0e4ec8576f41f3140488b4ee8ff32)), closes [#1819](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1819) | ||
| * **artifacts:** mark Windows launchable files as host executables ([#1824](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1824)) ([e8491e0](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e8491e023a255f790ae9850225084d7495e9ade0)), closes [#1819](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1819) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the 6.5.0 notes are published, this line attributes a second shipped executable-marking fix to e8491e0, but that commit changes only src/artifacts/hostExecutableMarking.test.ts; the actual implementation was already introduced by 91f843b and is described immediately above. Keep e8491e0 in contribution provenance rather than double-counting the same package behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **setup:** preserve unrelated Hermes YAML line formatting ([58e91e1](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/58e91e14bd5659dd57acbb91e56b5fc6a6963c80)) | ||
| * **setup:** register a stable launcher when run through bunx ([#1731](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1731)) ([d412def](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d412def7225a556e6d2140176dc9ab4bd34af0f3)) | ||
| * **setup:** retain symlinked data roots during uninstall ([#1821](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1821)) ([7e2f79a](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7e2f79ab45a23ab844f89fb93c9cdf202230c73f)) | ||
| * **test:** wait for Hopper reconnect listener readiness ([#1885](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1885)) ([d3e83b0](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d3e83b089943e2941dace3546a068a59bd0a335e)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When these notes are published, this entry presents a package bug fix even though d3e83b0 modifies only tests/fixtures/hopperBridgeReconnectProbe.py, which is absent from package.json#files and is not used by an installed CLI or MCP runtime. Retain this test-harness stabilization in contribution provenance instead of listing it as shipped behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 37cbaae3f2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **harmony:** project HarmonyOS package inventory evidence ([#1447](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1447)) ([f2150eb](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/f2150eb9a7ed76748238009ca6666efa52de5271)) | ||
| * **javascript:** recover code-split bundles from multiple inputs ([#1686](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1686)) ([12c4160](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/12c416005f9d2abf438f4df4447972424d781b65)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For macOS/Windows users or installations without external Wakaru tooling, this entry presents multi-input recovery as generally available, but docs/javascript-recovery.md:10-20 limits the adapter to Linux x64, requires a caller-supplied Wakaru ^1.13.0 executable plus util-linux prlimit, and docs/javascript-recovery.md:139-141 records real CLI/MCP verification only with Wakaru 1.14.0 while explicitly leaving other platforms unclaimed. Qualify the release note with those operational and verification boundaries.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4fa968fd1c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **cli:** await browser scenario cleanup on interrupts ([aaeadf2](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/aaeadf2d4c4e3f0d0581af2dca33c5bfdc2bcb0e)) | ||
| * **cli:** retry retained browser scenario cleanup ([4daea94](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/4daea941bfeeb426886f2d048aed7f3cb2dbf97b)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For real Chromium launched by the CLI, neither interrupt cleanup nor retry after an initial cleanup failure is verified here: browserScenarioCancellationCli.test.ts:8-12 sends real signals but explicitly substitutes a controlled session without Chromium, and browserScenarioCleanup.test.ts:42-64 injects failures without opening a browser process or profile. The real-browser lane covers cancellation while an external attached target remains open and ordinary owned-profile cleanup, not these two CLI failure paths, so qualify both entries rather than presenting fixture coverage as real-browser verification.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L44
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4f7ea5002b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **android:** bound inline search Evidence with retained inventory provenance ([#1890](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1890)) ([7a0140b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7a0140b4aa43276368058ab98826b77e040ea14f)) | ||
| * **android:** preserve executable static initializer evidence ([#1876](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1876)) ([efbc25f](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/efbc25fbea1b6ade2a284a4916644c791f83bf49)), closes [#1846](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1846) | ||
| * **apktool:** run Windows batch launchers through cmd.exe ([#1777](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1777)) ([ae95e68](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ae95e68ba5fa95cf2ec0453b50ffd217cabf5359)), closes [#1774](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1774) | ||
| * **apple:** preserve ARM64E X1 architecture identity ([f598bab](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/f598bab488e38c378d69346fa3c106f9e18529ed)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users inventorying real macOS 27 binaries such as the /bin/ls example cited by the implementation, this entry presents X1 identity preservation without its verification scope. The changed test constructs Mach-O bytes and mocks lipo output, while the real Apple workflow builds generic arm64e fixtures and does not run this changed boundary test against an X1 artifact; state that real ARM64E X1 CLI/MCP integration remains unverified.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L44
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c1114b7a0d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ### Features | ||
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For macOS, Windows, Linux arm64, or ordinary PSP container/PRX users, this reads as general PSP ELF support even though GhidraProvider rejects the profile outside Linux x64 and docs/ghidra-psp.md:11-25 limits it to a narrowly declared little-endian static ELF32 ET_EXEC (excluding PRX and PBP/ISO/CSO). Qualify the entry with that enforced host/format boundary and the caller-installed compatible extension requirement so users do not select this workflow for inputs it categorically refuses.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8053468beb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **native:** admit raw binaries with caller-supplied architecture and entry ([#1868](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1868)) ([7c207c7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7c207c79512f6baa70f4ed9d7d5334ab2d62f3ac)) | ||
| * **native:** expose typed incoming references at exact addresses ([#1715](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1715)) ([cdd9fe7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cdd9fe716774c9e5abd121b70e9fd5e1eb91d2b8)) | ||
| * **update:** update Bun global installations ([#1735](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1735)) ([e4027e4](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4027e4afccc6316cd9cfc27c7b0427e66ceb91f)) | ||
| * **wasm:** inspect local artifacts with WABT ([#1533](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1533)) ([ffaf2c1](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ffaf2c12f1793c7c451e66dc09c3074544a4c086)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Windows and Linux users, this entry presents WABT artifact inspection without its verification scope. The implementation requires caller-supplied WABT 1.0.42, and docs/wasm-artifacts.md:12-13 states that the real-tool profile was exercised only on macOS arm64 while other hosts remain unverified; include those boundaries rather than presenting the capability as generally verified.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2f3fecf558
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **javascript:** recover code-split bundles from multiple inputs ([#1686](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1686)) ([12c4160](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/12c416005f9d2abf438f4df4447972424d781b65)) | ||
| * **javascript:** resolve exact package import aliases ([#1862](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1862)) ([d28b41e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d28b41ea4e93bb4c4d360a3bf2291ca83bb2b378)) | ||
| * **native:** admit raw binaries with caller-supplied architecture and entry ([#1868](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1868)) ([7c207c7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7c207c79512f6baa70f4ed9d7d5334ab2d62f3ac)) | ||
| * **native:** expose typed incoming references at exact addresses ([#1715](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1715)) ([cdd9fe7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cdd9fe716774c9e5abd121b70e9fd5e1eb91d2b8)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Hopper or IDA users, this reads as a provider-independent native feature, but a repo-wide operation search shows inspect_native_instruction is admitted only by GHIDRA_FUNCTION_OPERATIONS (src/ghidra/GhidraFunctionValues.ts:40-45), while IDA_OPERATIONS omits it and the implementation is solely in ReaGhidraBridge; docs/native-investigation.md:198-207 likewise identifies Ghidra and says other providers may omit the facet. Label this as Ghidra-only and state the real-Ghidra verification scope so the release note does not advertise an unavailable native workflow.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a062951443
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **firmware:** name missing extractor dependencies in partial extraction ([#1879](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1879)) ([1769417](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/176941700118cc33c86e07373cd6950f30548386)) | ||
| * **ghidra:** report progress while startup is pending ([#1877](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1877)) ([29d2624](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/29d2624b3475586356c27f518bf6b823030268fb)) | ||
| * **hopper:** let failed one-shot commands exit while retaining a lease ([#1763](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1763)) ([e8528ce](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e8528cedcdfb1ca1d769304afdc353936e8e0d70)) | ||
| * **hopper:** preserve observed process failures across requests ([#1927](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1927)) ([601814e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/601814ed0e4a0c57d6e045da0e6cf8ee2f29bb7f)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For real Hopper processes that exit or receive a signal while requests are active or queued, this entry presents cross-request preservation without its verification scope. The changed lifecycle tests use an ObservedProcess event emitter and HopperFixtureLauncher, while the documented verify:hopper lanes do not terminate an installed Hopper during requests or verify that its exit code, signal, and output survive into later CLI/MCP failures. State that this failure path remains unverified with real Hopper rather than presenting the simulated lifecycle coverage as real-provider validation.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a7f11c3b72
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ### Features | ||
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **harmony:** project HarmonyOS package inventory evidence ([#1447](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1447)) ([f2150eb](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/f2150eb9a7ed76748238009ca6666efa52de5271)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users analyzing HSP/App Pack inputs or invoking this workflow from the installed 6.5.0 package, this entry presents HarmonyOS package inventory without its verification scope. The recorded verify:harmony lane in docs/testing.md:639-647 exercises one pinned HAP against the repository build and explicitly says it does not verify an installed package; the other advertised package formats therefore have only synthetic coverage. Qualify the entry with the real HAP CLI/MCP scope and leave installed-package and real HSP/App Pack integration explicitly unverified.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 92548e8c2a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **browser:** retain effective source-map response urls ([062723e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/062723e44e937c1e1df865e9ae16184b41e70ae8)) | ||
| * **build:** preserve LF text checkouts on Windows ([#1807](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1807)) ([031d778](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/031d7781f0f6c99e5f14e67f56cb89a88d6af3eb)) | ||
| * **build:** preserve resource controls in strict Turbo tasks ([#1809](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1809)) ([2e22330](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/2e223300375101558f90b6e78ef9612c55626673)) | ||
| * **bun:** report the real runtime and enforce worker memory budgets on Windows ([#1730](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1730)) ([66c2157](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/66c21572defc97fe277cad49d3173bd4073d1f58)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users running JavaScript helpers under Bun on Windows, this presents runtime detection and memory-budget enforcement as verified behavior, but the implementation's own docs/installation.md explicitly states that CI tests Node.js only, while the Windows native conformance lane launches its memory-limit probes through process.execPath rather than Bun. Qualify the entry to state that real Windows Bun integration remains unverified.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4d7c17b7ed
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **update:** update Bun global installations ([#1735](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1735)) ([e4027e4](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4027e4afccc6316cd9cfc27c7b0427e66ceb91f)) | ||
| * **wasm:** inspect local artifacts with WABT ([#1533](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1533)) ([ffaf2c1](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ffaf2c12f1793c7c451e66dc09c3074544a4c086)) | ||
| * **website:** add multilingual editions and translation workflow ([a2d3338](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/a2d3338e90a3a11385e2f63bedaa9750612f8719)) | ||
| * **website:** follow the system dark mode and fix small-screen text ([#1894](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1894)) ([12ee785](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/12ee785e5e61132898adecf9424ce6706a2e754a)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The release range also contains commit 4353089 / #1699, which styles <kbd> elements, constrains the Get Started Node.js help width, and adds depth-aware indentation to expanded Evidence details, but the 6.5 section ends its website entries here without recording that user-visible change. Add it, or group it with the other website presentation work, so the permanent release notes cover the meaningful behavior shipped in this release.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: de40b82ed7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ### Features | ||
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **ghidra:** apply validated analyzer overrides before analysis ([9878bb7](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/9878bb7296c13c2b4838be76f6128e5fc31eda3c)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users enabling REA_GHIDRA_DISABLED_ANALYZERS through the CLI or MCP server, this presents the feature without its verification boundary. The real verify:ghidra:seeds lane invokes ReaGhidraAnalysisOptions.java directly with -noanalysis on a POSIX-hosted raw x86 fixture; it does not exercise the environment parsing, profile binding, launcher wiring, or auto-analysis path through a public CLI/MCP workflow, and the Windows verifier merely checks packaging collisions. State that the production real-provider workflow remains unverified rather than presenting the direct pre-script probe as end-to-end validation.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **setup:** register a stable launcher when run through bunx ([#1731](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1731)) ([d412def](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d412def7225a556e6d2140176dc9ab4bd34af0f3)) | ||
| * **setup:** retain symlinked data roots during uninstall ([#1821](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1821)) ([7e2f79a](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7e2f79ab45a23ab844f89fb93c9cdf202230c73f)) | ||
| * **setup:** verify independently selected skill destinations ([bb50813](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/bb508134efbba392a404b651d6ec05be8b7eac1e)) | ||
| * **test:** audit static Wasm and Harmony tool wording ([#1917](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1917)) ([dfe3117](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/dfe31172ca0a090be3f40bc134f54d69c08e31d8)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When published under Bug Fixes, this entry implies a shipped behavior correction, but commit dfe3117 changes only src/contracts/toolEffects.test.ts by adding two audit exceptions; it does not change either tool's contract wording or runtime behavior. Move this to the Tests section or retain it only in contribution provenance so the package notes describe an actual behavior change.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L48-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8f50c59b9b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **javascript:** reuse collected callable identities for returns ([d3088c3](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d3088c3795f6c37cb3b6aec0bb0c371dd0640ee8)) | ||
| * **javascript:** skip nested callables during fingerprint traversal ([#1871](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1871)) ([097f0d5](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/097f0d54afceb3ce61dbaa24dd6736658d1fce06)) | ||
| * **javascript:** skip the repeated-prefix scan on first capture visits ([#1789](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1789)) ([41544fb](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/41544fb952aef84fcf6ff5d9a5284cf2b2985053)) | ||
| * **mcp:** bundle internal modules to reduce Windows startup I/O ([76e4153](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/76e4153d346b14ef194222bbeef240cf8a16dc99)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line and line 122 both reference commit 76e4153 and describe the same Windows MCP startup optimization: the commit subject is “reduce Windows startup module resolution,” while its body describes bundling internal modules to reduce startup I/O. Publishing both entries therefore double-counts one change; retain a single entry with the PR reference.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d2906b5244
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **hopper:** preserve startup failures and recover denied launches ([069308b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/069308bbe6d73b1d87038b43c9121658325042a9)), closes [#1808](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1808) | ||
| * **hopper:** wait for late bridges during cleanup ([#1866](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1866)) ([cf7477e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf7477eb4642bc07228fa33ccc4c87656e6e3003)) | ||
| * **ida:** declare GUI navigation for attached legacy analysis ([#1764](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1764)) ([cf69207](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf692072b56903b60426e4b301b3c48fd31ee0fd)), closes [#1712](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1712) | ||
| * **ida:** preserve non-x86 call edges and workflow uncertainty ([#1906](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1906)) ([0ae38e1](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/0ae38e1e31414c67a3be09231d208f0726c035f8)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users relying on ARM64 or other non-x86 call edges, this presents edge preservation without its real-provider verification boundary. The changed commit adds fixture-backed call-graph tests, while the real IDA verifier only checks that procedure_callees returns successfully (scripts/verify-real-ida.mjs:153-170) and defaults to the leaf rea_fixture_add function (tests/conformance/ida/inventory.c:9-10), so it never verifies preservation of an outgoing edge from real IDA. State that non-x86 edge retention remains unverified against a real provider.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c5b8eb0d65
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -1,5 +1,181 @@ | |||
| # Changelog | |||
|
|
|||
| ## [6.5.0](https://github.com/morluto/rea/compare/rea-agents-6.4.0...rea-agents-6.5.0) (2026-10-11) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Before publishing this release, replace the unreviewed bot draft with the contributor-aware notes required by the release process. A tree-wide check at this commit finds no docs/releases/6.5.0.contributions.json, provenance link, or 6.5 Thanks credits, even though in-range commits such as 85c1d25 and 9878bb7 record external co-authors; publishing this section would therefore permanently omit verified attribution and prevent the release-note checker from validating the complete range and credits.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L38-L38
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **process:** align capture Evidence provider admission ([713db4d](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/713db4dc2665c964707cb0e937e8794cbe73534e)) | ||
| * **process:** observe already-due trailing callbacks before settling the capture journal ([#1700](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1700)) ([ed084b3](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ed084b3dbb13ec9dee1adc8f5b76e784b52c00bb)), closes [#1697](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1697) | ||
| * **process:** retain owned command cleanup diagnostics ([#1907](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1907)) ([38539a2](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/38539a2f4a522243d6fc369ae34ef30e2a2f80cc)), closes [#1856](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1856) | ||
| * **session:** verify retained client liveness on open fast path ([e59db2f](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e59db2f5deefb1c5e74f01e19631f6d75cfaa25a)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Ghidra, IDA, or non-Linux Hopper sessions, this generic entry presents retained-client liveness recovery without its verification boundary. Commit e59db2f records real child-death/reopen verification only for headless Linux Hopper and explicitly leaves Ghidra and IDA liveness outside that verification, so qualify the note with the exercised provider/platform scope rather than implying equivalent real-provider validation for every retained client.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2a3c7fe789
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **managed:** bind row budget charges to metadata identities ([#1897](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1897)) ([23d50ea](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/23d50ea3bec186b4459d36c04854a92276accdf1)), closes [#1878](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1878) | ||
| * **managed:** bound transient CIL by decoded instruction count ([#1822](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1822)) ([554cb45](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/554cb45f7ff967884c9d1fdf706c20803d76a6df)) | ||
| * **managed:** charge retained member facts instead of decoding bounds ([#1768](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1768)) ([3078729](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/30787297d49bf93e67f62a9ec42f896188d57a20)) | ||
| * **managed:** charge transient CIL by decoded instructions ([554cb45](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/554cb45f7ff967884c9d1fdf706c20803d76a6df)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line and line 77 both reference commit 554cb45 and describe the same CIL budgeting change: charging transient capacity by decoded instruction count. Publishing both entries double-counts one fix; retain a single entry with the #1822 reference.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8e672c8e6c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **contracts:** mark foreign execution and device mutation destructive ([#1904](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1904)) ([0b7fc40](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/0b7fc40eeef03b06de08d886572c2862331d8947)) | ||
| * **docs:** validate translated README website destinations ([c9136ee](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/c9136eef716aa8d32e0301189fbf5a511ff62d5d)) | ||
| * **errors:** stop recommending retries for non-retryable failures ([#1869](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1869)) ([fb94d9d](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/fb94d9dde0ccda83ae520ac6fb22b1d283562cf3)) | ||
| * **evaluation:** authenticate delivered Evidence citations ([844fa52](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/844fa52772c1533f7358a71a764da780503775a3)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When these notes are published for 6.5.0, this entry suggests that delivered Evidence citations are authenticated in the shipped CLI/MCP runtime, but commit 844fa52 changes only src/evaluation/* and its tests; a repository-wide import check at this commit finds the sole non-test consumer in scripts/verify-agent-experience.mjs, which is not included by package.json#files. Keep this internal evaluation-harness correction in contribution provenance rather than advertising it as package behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L48-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fb08879626
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **hopper:** let failed one-shot commands exit while retaining a lease ([#1763](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1763)) ([e8528ce](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e8528cedcdfb1ca1d769304afdc353936e8e0d70)) | ||
| * **hopper:** preserve observed process failures across requests ([#1927](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1927)) ([601814e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/601814ed0e4a0c57d6e045da0e6cf8ee2f29bb7f)) | ||
| * **hopper:** preserve startup failures and recover denied launches ([069308b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/069308bbe6d73b1d87038b43c9121658325042a9)), closes [#1808](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1808) | ||
| * **hopper:** wait for late bridges during cleanup ([#1866](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1866)) ([cf7477e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf7477eb4642bc07228fa33ccc4c87656e6e3003)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For real Hopper launches whose bridge appears only after startup has timed out, this entry presents the cleanup recovery as verified without its provider boundary. The changed acceptance case launches hopperLaunchAdmission.mjs under Node, while the documented real-Hopper lanes cover ordinary owned-runtime cleanup and request deadlines but do not induce a failed startup followed by a late bridge; state that this cleanup path remains unverified with installed Hopper.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **hopper:** preserve observed process failures across requests ([#1927](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1927)) ([601814e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/601814ed0e4a0c57d6e045da0e6cf8ee2f29bb7f)) | ||
| * **hopper:** preserve startup failures and recover denied launches ([069308b](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/069308bbe6d73b1d87038b43c9121658325042a9)), closes [#1808](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1808) | ||
| * **hopper:** wait for late bridges during cleanup ([#1866](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1866)) ([cf7477e](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf7477eb4642bc07228fa33ccc4c87656e6e3003)) | ||
| * **ida:** declare GUI navigation for attached legacy analysis ([#1764](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1764)) ([cf69207](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/cf692072b56903b60426e4b301b3c48fd31ee0fd)), closes [#1712](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1712) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For attached Windows IDA users relying on binary_session.effects.may_show_ui, this advertises the corrected declaration without its verification scope. The changed conformance test uses RecordingIdaMcp, and although the real attached-IDA verifier invokes the relevant analysis operations, it never calls binary_session or asserts the advertised UI-effect metadata; qualify the entry so fixture-backed contract coverage is not presented as real-provider verification of this declaration.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L46-L46
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0045c777cb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ### Features | ||
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **ghidra:** admit soft-float MIPS32r2 ELF with integer-register float storage ([#1949](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1949)) ([5e219de](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/5e219de44134d34f5a07a9cd1911fb2295bf1d88)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For users with soft-float MIPS32r2 shared/relocatable images, incomplete ABI metadata, machine-specific flags, or Windows Ghidra, this reads as general ELF support even though ghidraMipsUnsupportedReason admits only ELF32 ET_EXEC with explicit o32/ARCH_32R2 flags and a compatible version-0 ABI record, while Windows P0 rejects MIPS entirely. Qualify the entry with that enforced target/host boundary and note that the real-provider lane covers source-owned cross-compiled fixtures on Ghidra 12.1.4/JDK 21 rather than executing MIPS code.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ebce8a90f2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ### Features | ||
|
|
||
| * **ghidra:** admit bounded PSP ELF through installed Allegrex ([#1599](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1599)) ([e4407db](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/e4407dbed5dc24851f47532f5e3d75d5627d3e7d)) | ||
| * **ghidra:** admit relocatable MIPS32r2 ELF objects ([#1950](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1950)) ([290d301](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/290d301ec770955f313c2d48678ed0ae3b9f8a73)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Windows Ghidra users or inputs outside the verified ABI profile, this reads as general relocatable MIPS32r2 support, but docs/ghidra-mips.md:16-56 admits only ELF32 ET_REL with explicit o32/ARCH_32R2 and compatible version-0 ABI flags on Linux/macOS Ghidra; Windows P0, missing or unsupported ABI declarations, MIPS16/microMIPS, and machine-specific variants are refused. State that boundary and the real-provider verification scope rather than advertising all relocatable MIPS32r2 ELF objects.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L44-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 60dec72bb9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ### Bug Fixes | ||
|
|
||
| * **adb:** share actionable provider configuration refusals ([c42232f](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/c42232f566d55fe7191763649755148c768eef9f)) | ||
| * **adb:** share host configuration refusals with apktool ([#1954](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1954)) ([39418ea](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/39418ea173763ca55d4f116992ee903bcaeb1898)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This entry attributes another shipped configuration-refusal fix to 39418ea, but that commit changes only the ADB/Apktool CLI tests and their test harness; the production implementation is entirely in c42232f and is already described immediately above. Keep 39418ea in contribution provenance rather than presenting the same runtime behavior as a second fix.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L48-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| * **managed:** index attribute constructor owners once per layout ([#1943](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1943)) ([c2cf7dc](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/c2cf7dcb86e11350214f82e5c51de7ca6ee3d27a)) | ||
| * **managed:** report ExportedType rows in managed member inspection ([#1828](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1828)) ([ed1519d](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ed1519ddee02739f57136e356786f64c7f74fed0)) | ||
| * **managed:** resolve member ownership through pointer tables ([#1886](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1886)) ([a95795c](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/a95795c6ed3cb149e03460f4c818ad12e0c670d9)) | ||
| * **managed:** share first-match member list ownership ([#1955](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1955)) ([7d92d93](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/7d92d93a550f3be221d7cf1da07c37ea1770e922)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This entry presents 7d92d93 as a separate shipped ownership fix, but its only change is increasing a test fixture from 40,000 to 100,000 rows and adding a timing assertion; the implementation was introduced by 52e76c5 and is already listed on the next line. Retain the follow-up in contribution provenance instead of double-counting the package behavior.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L48-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 844645d663
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| * **web:** reject NUL bytes in web tool local path inputs ([499ac18](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/499ac180115de7c9de3f1adc55159ffa6e9bb40e)) | ||
| * **website:** clarify translated terminology and RTL flows ([a956275](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/a956275d8d0249c16dad282a3fb5d7da48fb2d6f)) | ||
| * **website:** incorporate multilingual contributor refinements ([d981a58](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/d981a58d7f5344c3ab2117b6384aece4d1c35480)) | ||
| * **windows:** bring the real Windows Ghidra verifiers up to date ([#1863](https://github.com/morluto/rea/issues/1863)) ([ea40f71](https://github.com/morluto/rea/commit/ea40f717b26392000f989a8b500f6774b5e85091)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When published under Bug Fixes, this entry implies a delivered 6.5.0 behavior correction, but ea40f71 changes only scripts/verify-real-ghidra-windows.mjs and scripts/verify-packaged-ghidra-windows.mjs; neither verifier is included in package.json#files or used by the installed CLI/MCP runtime. Retain this validation-harness update in contribution provenance rather than presenting it as a package fix.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L48-L48
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🤖 I have created a release beep boop
6.5.0 (2026-10-11)
Features
Bug Fixes
Performance Improvements
Code Refactoring
Documentation
Tests
Continuous Integration
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.