Skip to content

Conversation

@mosfet80
Copy link
Contributor

Description

amend_target_dependencies is deprecated - move to target_link_libraries()
cleaned moveit_ros folder

Checklist

  • Required by CI: Code is auto formatted using clang-format
  • Extend the tutorials / documentation reference
  • Document API changes relevant to the user in the MIGRATION.md notes
  • Create tests, which fail without this PR reference
  • Include a screenshot if changing a GUI
  • While waiting for someone to review your request, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers

@mosfet80 mosfet80 changed the title Fix amend deprecation Fix amend deprecation into moveit_ros folder Jan 17, 2026
@mosfet80 mosfet80 marked this pull request as draft January 17, 2026 22:52
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (848c062) to head (726a7e5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #3664       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.24%   0.00%   -46.23%     
==========================================
  Files         726      51      -675     
  Lines       59483    5938    -53545     
  Branches     7624    1057     -6567     
==========================================
- Hits        27504       0    -27504     
+ Misses      31813    5938    -25875     
+ Partials      166       0      -166     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mosfet80 mosfet80 force-pushed the FixAmend_deprecation-moveit_ros branch 3 times, most recently from 15d0770 to 3bb49ed Compare January 27, 2026 15:54
@mosfet80 mosfet80 marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2026 15:55
@mosfet80 mosfet80 force-pushed the FixAmend_deprecation-moveit_ros branch from 3bb49ed to 41379d0 Compare January 29, 2026 00:24
@mosfet80 mosfet80 marked this pull request as draft January 29, 2026 00:29
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
@mosfet80 mosfet80 force-pushed the FixAmend_deprecation-moveit_ros branch from 41379d0 to 726a7e5 Compare January 29, 2026 00:44
@urfeex
Copy link

urfeex commented Jan 29, 2026

@mosfet80 thank you for addressing this! I also started working on that a couple of weeks back but couldn't find the time to complete it. What is your main motivation only fixing deprecations in moveit_ros? Just to get a starting point? I assume that the others might have to be migrated, as well if things would want to get built in the future.

My main motivation to start working on that was to make the Qt6 port easier. Do you also have that on the agenda? Otherwise I would start working on that ontop of your changes.

@mosfet80
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mosfet80 thank you for addressing this! I also started working on that a couple of weeks back but couldn't find the time to complete it. What is your main motivation only fixing deprecations in moveit_ros? Just to get a starting point? I assume that the others might have to be migrated, as well if things would want to get built in the future.

My main motivation to start working on that was to make the Qt6 port easier. Do you also have that on the agenda? Otherwise I would start working on that ontop of your changes.

The motivation is to remove deprecated functions. I can't compile moveit with the "rolling" version of ament_cmake_target_dependencies.
https://github.com/ament/ament_cmake/blob/rolling/ament_cmake_target_dependencies/CHANGELOG.rst
Unfortunately, it's not a quick fix.

I actually split the work into two commits: the first to overcome the ament_cmake deprecation and the second to compile with QT6.

As soon as I've completed the changes, I'll share the report containing both changes.

@urfeex
Copy link

urfeex commented Jan 30, 2026

That sounds great, then I'll keep my feed still.

The deprecated ament functions are not a showstopper for compiling on Rolling in my side (and I think neither in the build farm), but the Qt6 dependencies are. I still think, it's a good thing to combine both, as you'll have to touch a lot of link targets with the Qt6 migration, anyway.

Let me know, if I can be of any help and may it only be helping out in reviewing here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants