Skip to content

Conversation

@rotdrop
Copy link

@rotdrop rotdrop commented Oct 13, 2020

Rationale: this allows to support "custom" group LDAP classes, like the
groupOfMembers class of the rfc2307bis draft. The core user_ldap app
could also be changed to make this more handy, but already allows custom
group filters.

groupOfMembers and other custom group classes do not require a member attribute, i.e. it is possible to create empty groups without the "Gurkerei" of adding an empty member attribute.

Rationale: this allows to support "custom" group LDAP classes, like the
groupOfMembers class of the rfc2307bis draft. The core user_ldap app
could also be changed to make this more handy, but already allows custom
group filters.

Signed-off-by: Claus-Justus Heine <[email protected]>
@rotdrop rotdrop force-pushed the feature/new-group-template branch from 2244b19 to a625cd8 Compare October 13, 2020 20:04
@blizzz
Copy link
Member

blizzz commented Oct 19, 2020

@rotdrop I could not push to your branch, so I pulled this over to #219 (and invited you to the Nextcloud organization)

@blizzz blizzz closed this Oct 19, 2020
@rotdrop
Copy link
Author

rotdrop commented Nov 4, 2020 via email

@blizzz
Copy link
Member

blizzz commented Nov 10, 2020

Hi, unfortunately I did not follow you invitation link in due time, can you please re-invite me? I suppose this is needed to sign the commits. Thank you! Claus

Just saw it now, sorry. Will do in a second!

@bernhara
Copy link

When will this evolution be available in an official release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants