-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
Add Vale vocabulary list #1674
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Vale vocabulary list #1674
Conversation
f4989ff to
ebde684
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved to unblock! Should definitely whitelist generated files though, and codeblocks if possible
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Output ngrok url to console | ||
| // Output ngrok URL to console |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a passing question, is there any way to make this ignore code snippets? In this case, it's a good change, but I think it'd be weird if you got a vale error for a variable name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do need to look into how to fine-tune it that way - I had to remove a rule enforcing lowercase "ngrok" because sometimes it appears in the code as NgrokFooBar 🙃
|
|
||
| <Note> | ||
| Ensure your chosen domain has the proper TLS/SSL certs provisioned in order to create a secure, working connection. | ||
| Ensure your chosen domain has the proper TLS/SSL certs provisioned to create a secure, working connection. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice. "in order to" is the bane of my existence
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
once we turn Vale back on in the dashboard "in order to" should fail the CI check and force you to delete it before merging 😈
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is generated so the main repo is going to put this back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is generated so the main repo is going to put this back.
This PR:
We should be able to safely turn Vale CI checks back on in the Mintlify dashboard after this PR is merged. There might be some unnecessary noise from warnings and suggestions at first but we can continue to iterate on them to make them useful.