Skip to content

Conversation

@dosumis
Copy link
Contributor

@dosumis dosumis commented Feb 14, 2020

See See #350
DON'T MERGE YET! More discussion needed.

@dosumis dosumis changed the title First draft attempt at some Q2Q causal relations. See #350 First draft attempt at some Q2Q causal relations. Feb 14, 2020
@dosumis
Copy link
Contributor Author

dosumis commented Feb 14, 2020

Currently going with phenotype_results_in and phenotype_results_from, maybe simplify to phenotype results_from / results_in ?

There is demand for weaker sounding relations, do we add these?

Some examples (hemolytic anemia) might better be considered P->Q not Q->Q

For use within a phenotype def, should we restrict direction to results_from?

Ultimate aim is to define with reference to process -> process causal relations if poss but this will take work.

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Does the label "phenotype" capture the wild type (i.e. normal phenotypes) as well? If so, I think I am good with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants