Skip to content

Conversation

cyberhuman
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #31.
There is also a PR #48 which narrows down the integer to 32 bits instead, which is worse IMO because it will break working with BIGINT fields.

apeschar and others added 8 commits April 25, 2022 13:11
@cyberhuman cyberhuman closed this Jul 3, 2024
@cyberhuman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wrong source branch, will raise a different PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

int63 values are bound as int64, making them unsigned
4 participants