Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict.
Based on Andrej Karpathy's LLM Council methodology.
- Frame — Your question gets enriched with workspace context
- Convene — 5 advisors analyze independently in parallel (Contrarian, First Principles, Expansionist, Outsider, Executor)
- Peer Review — Advisors review each other's work anonymously
- Synthesize — A chairman produces the final verdict with agreements, clashes, blind spots, and a clear recommendation
- Report — Visual HTML report + full markdown transcript
| Advisor | Thinking Style |
|---|---|
| The Contrarian | Finds what's wrong, missing, or will fail |
| The First Principles Thinker | Strips assumptions, rebuilds from ground up |
| The Expansionist | Finds upside everyone else is missing |
| The Outsider | Zero context, fresh eyes, catches curse of knowledge |
| The Executor | What do you do Monday morning? |
council thisrun the councilwar room thispressure-test thisstress-test thisdebate this
Copy SKILL.md to your Claude Code skills folder:
# Project-level
cp SKILL.md .claude/skills/llm-council/SKILL.md
# Global (all projects)
cp SKILL.md ~/.claude/skills/llm-council/SKILL.mdOr for OpenClaw users, place in your workspace skills/ directory.
Every council session produces:
council-report-[timestamp].html— Visual report for scanningcouncil-transcript-[timestamp].md— Full transcript for reference
✅ Decisions with real stakes and trade-offs ✅ Multiple viable options where being wrong is expensive ✅ Ideas that need pressure-testing from different angles
❌ Factual lookups with one right answer ❌ Creation tasks (write me a tweet) ❌ Processing tasks (summarize this)
- Methodology: Andrej Karpathy
- Skill adaptation: Bruno Okamoto
- Source article: Google Doc
MIT