Update testregistry.textproto

[sachendras]

Defining a new test RT-1.71

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @sachendras, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new test definition into the existing test registry. The primary purpose is to register a specific BGP-related test, making it discoverable and trackable within the system. This ensures that the new test for disabling peer AS filters is formally recognized.

Highlights

• New Test Definition: A new test entry with ID "RT-1.71" has been added to the testregistry.textproto file. This test is described as "BGP Disable Peer AS Filter (disable-peer-as-filter)".

Changelog

• testregistry.textproto
  • Added a new test entry for "RT-1.71".

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[OpenConfigBot]

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5117 / b21ba4f

No tests identified for validation.

Help

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request adds a new test entry RT-1.71 to the registry. The primary feedback concerns the sorting of the new entry, which deviates from the numeric sorting pattern established in the file, and the use of empty placeholders for documentation links.

[gemini-code-assist]

The test ID RT-1.71 is placed out of order. The registry follows a numeric sorting pattern for the test ID suffixes (for example, RT-1.9 is followed by RT-1.10). Based on this convention, RT-1.71 should be moved to the end of the RT-1.x section, following RT-1.66 (around line 936).

[gemini-code-assist]

The readme field is defined as a repeated string in the proto and should contain valid URLs. Providing an empty string "" adds an invalid entry to the list. If the README is not yet available, it is better to omit the field entirely to keep the registry clean.