Skip to content

Conversation

@autermann
Copy link
Member

@autermann autermann commented Dec 11, 2025

I think we should make more clear how the templating works. This is just a first proposal, but we should somehow make clear, that the parameters used in the AsyncAPI description somehow have to correspond to the parameters used in the OpenAPI description. E.g. if the resource /collections/{collectionId}/items corresponds to the AsyncAPI channel https://example.org/asyncapi.json#/channels/{collectionId} we have to make sure, that the two parameters have the same name and schema and that only parameters defined on the path level are used (i.e. get: {...} could define a different schema for a path parameter then post: {...})

This PR does not yet address the same-schema part...

@tomkralidis tomkralidis requested a review from a team December 17, 2025 15:19
@tomkralidis
Copy link
Contributor

2025-12-17 SWG meeting:

  • use RFC6570 for link templates instead of OGC API - Records
  • re-use of parameters in OpenAPI && AsyncAPI
  • @autermann to update

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants