Add "PG Critic" to the PG problem editor. #2768
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
drgrice1
force-pushed
the
pg-critic
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4944ab0 to
44816d3
Compare
This adds the PG critic results from `WeBWorK::PG::Critic` to the PG problem editor. Note that the "Format Code" tab in the editor is now the "Code Maintenance" tab. This is because this new option is not a code formatter. All of the options fit into the category of code maintenance, so this is a better name.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds the PG critic results from
WeBWorK::PG::Criticto the PG problem editor. Note that the "Format Code" tab in the editor is now the "Code Maintenance" tab. This is because this new option is not a code formatter. All of the options fit into the category of code, so this is a better name.This is dependent on openwebwork/pg#1278 (so make sure to check that PG branch out to test this), and is intended to replace #2748.