Some clean-up in test code#910
Conversation
|
@mgautierfr Can you please review? |
veloman-yunkan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes look good to me. But the commit message is a little confusing - no dependencies were updated, and the reason for the changes is not clear. To the best of my understanding it is a nice clean-up of test code (which is definitely welcome) but if it additionally resolves some issue it better be stated in the description.
|
Thanks for the review @veloman-yunkan. I was working on another change to include |
|
@tusharpm I think that the commit message is still somewhat misleading - it creates an impression that something had changed in the API, dependencies, compiler, etc, so the test files had to be updated to keep things working. Please change the commit message to "Some clean-up in test files" and we will merge the PR. |
|
@tusharpm @veloman-yunkan Can one of you please complete this PR so we can merge it? |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #910 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 57.69% 57.69%
=======================================
Files 103 103
Lines 4976 4976
Branches 2083 2083
=======================================
Hits 2871 2871
Misses 713 713
Partials 1392 1392 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Well, I did it myself. |
counterParsingdefaultIndexdataerror_in_creatorparseLongPath