Skip to content

Conversation

@mklos-kw
Copy link
Member

@mklos-kw mklos-kw commented Jan 7, 2026

References: #11880 (fix: [OCISDEV-54] Strict-Transport-Security via proxy)

Description

Related Issue

  • Fixes <issue_link>

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • test case 1:
  • test case 2:
  • ...

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@mklos-kw mklos-kw force-pushed the backport/strict-transport-security-proxy branch 2 times, most recently from ba3835c to ac7a3f7 Compare January 7, 2026 10:43
@mklos-kw
Copy link
Member Author

mklos-kw commented Jan 7, 2026

CI blocked by Codacy check, however Codacy shows no details on why it fails. Other PRs are fine, original PR was fine, will revisit in a moment.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@mklos-kw mklos-kw merged commit 6d66db1 into stable-7.3 Jan 19, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@mklos-kw mklos-kw deleted the backport/strict-transport-security-proxy branch January 19, 2026 09:14
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2026
* fix: Strict-Transport-Security via proxy
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2026
* fix: Strict-Transport-Security via proxy
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2026
* fix: Strict-Transport-Security via proxy
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026
* fix: Strict-Transport-Security via proxy
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
* fix: Strict-Transport-Security via proxy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants