Open
Conversation
I tried this set [{0,1},{1,2},{2,0}] with python3.6 in PyCharm, I found the set was sorted to [{0,1},{1,2},{0,2}] automaticly. and the set[{0,1,2}] was append to the retList. But sort the lists before compare lists[:k-2] is better than the origin anyway. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When converting sets to lists, the ordering is non-deterministic.
For example if the input to aprioriGen was: ([{0,1}, {1,2}, {2,0}], 3)
If the lists stay in the same order as the sets appear, no two lists would have the same leading digit.
I think the optimisation only makes sense if you sort the lists first.