Fix: Improve recurring transaction processing logic#1
Open
Sameer184 wants to merge 1 commit intopiyush-eon:mainfrom
Open
Fix: Improve recurring transaction processing logic#1Sameer184 wants to merge 1 commit intopiyush-eon:mainfrom
Sameer184 wants to merge 1 commit intopiyush-eon:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
@Sameer184 is attempting to deploy a commit to the piyush55dude's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
KUSHAL-31
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix for Recurring Transactions: Accurate Dates, Duplicate Prevention, and Missed Transaction Handling
Description
This pull request fixes some major issues in how recurring transactions are processed in the project. The current logic had some gaps, especially when handling old dates, duplicates, and missed transactions. Below are the identified issues and implemented fixes:
Scenario:
If a user creates a recurring transaction with an old date, the current script only processes one recurring transaction (and that too with the current date). Moreover, if the batch script for recurring transactions is run, it does not create transactions based on
nextRecurringDate(whether daily, weekly, monthly, etc.). This caused missed records and inconsistencies.1. Incorrect Transaction Creation Dates
new Date()), instead of the scheduled recurring date (nextRecurringDate).new Date()withnextRecurringDatewhen creating transactions. Future dates are now calculated using thecalculateNextRecurringDatehelper function to ensure alignment with the recurring interval.2. Duplicate Transactions
userId,accountId, and date already existed, leading to duplicates.userId,accountId, and the transaction date before creating a new transaction.3. Missed or Overdue Transactions
nextRecurringDateup to the current date. Therefore, no transactions are skipped.4. Inconsistent updated to
nextRecurringDatenextRecurringDatewas not getting updated properly, which resulted in skipped or incorrect scheduling.nextRecurringDateandlastProcessedare updated after each successful transaction.Why These Fixes Are Important
nextRecurringDateensure that future transactions are scheduled correctly.Future Enhancements to Address Potential Bugs in updateTransactions Logic
recurringInterval,isRecurring,date), ensure all changes are properly reflected, especially fornextRecurringDate.descriptionoraccountId), we might need to decide whether related records should also be updated.Testing and Validation
userId, andaccountId.nextRecurringDateandlastProcessedattributes are updated consistently in every scenario.