Skip to content

Conversation

@yxuco
Copy link
Contributor

@yxuco yxuco commented Dec 10, 2020

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

[] Bugfix
[X] Feature
[] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[] Other... Please describe:

Fixes: #244

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?
ref #244 for details

@lixingwang lixingwang requested a review from mellistibco January 4, 2021 22:44

type valueKey string

const contextValueKey valueKey = "RequestParams"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we rename RequestParams to data or values?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

renamed valueKey to "values"

…move 'vendor' path

allows trigger developer to pass request parameters to handler w/o going through output mapper

Resulve issue project-flogo#224 GetRef() in support package should remove 'vendor' path

resubmit pull request to resolve issue project-flogo#224

Fix project-flogo#244 Trigger handler should provide option to pass request data to flow without explicit output mapping

update per comments on issue project-flogo#246
Copy link
Contributor

@lixingwang lixingwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mellistibco Please have a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants