Skip to content

Conversation

@yuvaramachandran-gurusamy
Copy link
Contributor

@yuvaramachandran-gurusamy yuvaramachandran-gurusamy commented Mar 7, 2025

RDKTV-35185: Syncup with 25Q1_sprint

Reason for change: Added sync between ssdp_http_server_callback and gdial_ssdp_set_friendlyname

Signed-off-by: yuvaramachandran_gurusamy [[email protected]]

Signed-off-by: yuvaramachandran_gurusamy <[email protected]>
…07_AddressAndLeakSanitizer

DELIA-67407: heap-buffer-overflow in gdialService - sprint
DELIA-67407: Fix redeclaration of GOptionContext

Signed-off-by: yuvaramachandran_gurusamy [[email protected]]
…LIA-67407_TypoFix

DELIA-67407: Fix redeclaration of GOptionContext
…p_set_friendlyname

Signed-off-by: yuvaramachandran_gurusamy <[email protected]>
…KTV-35185

RDKTV-35185: Add sync between ssdp_http_server_callback and gdial_ssdp_set_friendlyname
@yuvaramachandran-gurusamy yuvaramachandran-gurusamy changed the title RDKTV-35185 DELIA-67407: Syncup with 25Q1_sprint RDKTV-35185: Syncup with 25Q1_sprint Mar 7, 2025
@rdkcmf-jenkins
Copy link
Contributor

Sanity tests for ['BCM 7216OTT Refboard VA'] added.
https://jenkinsrdkm.cmf.code.rdkcentral.com/job/test-components-flow/74330/

@rdkcmf-jenkins
Copy link
Contributor

Sanity tests for ['RPI4 IPSTB'] added.
https://jenkinsrdkm.cmf.code.rdkcentral.com/job/test-components-flow/74331/

Reason for change: Implemented setManufacturerName and setModelName APIs for DIAL Server name configuration
			maintained the additional data url to specific app
Test Procedure: DIAL should work
Risks: None
Priority: P1

Signed-off-by: yuvaramachandran_gurusamy <[email protected]>
…K-55044_DIAL_Args

RDK-55044: Implement DIAL requirement to use on EU product - sprint
@rdkcmf-jenkins
Copy link
Contributor

Sanity tests for ['BCM 7216OTT Refboard VA'] added.
https://jenkinsrdkm.cmf.code.rdkcentral.com/job/test-components-flow/76042/

@rdkcmf-jenkins
Copy link
Contributor

Sanity tests for ['RPI4 IPSTB'] added.
https://jenkinsrdkm.cmf.code.rdkcentral.com/job/test-components-flow/76045/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants