rdmorganiser · Zack-83 · Oct 14, 2025 · Sep 17, 2025 · Sep 19, 2025 · Sep 19, 2025
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -107,14 +107,15 @@ In order to file issues, you will need a GitHub account.
 |Horizon 2020                     |[catalog][EHU]|[view][EHU]|2020-09|FDM Bayern eHumanities|
 |Mathematics                      |[catalog][MAT]|     |2022-11|DFG Excellence Cluster MATH+|
 |NFDI DMP Template                |[catalog][D4N]|           |2025-06|DMP4NFDI              |
+|Offboarding checklist            |[catalog][UDA]|           |2025-09|TU Darmstadt          |
 |Quality Assurance Tool for data  |[catalog][QAT]|           |2025-03|Mathmet / TC-IM 1449  |
 |Quality Assurance Tool for software  |[catalog][QAT]|       |2025-03|Mathmet / TC-IM 1449  |
 |Research data policy generator       |[catalog][FDN]|       |2025-04|FDNext                |
-|Software for collection management|[2 catalogs][N4Q]|       |       |NFDI4Culture          |
+|Software for collection management|[2 catalogs][N4Q]|       |2025-09|NFDI4Culture          |
 |VW Foundation - Basic DMP            |[catalog][VWB]|       |2025-06|FDM Bayern eHumanities|
 |VW Foundation - Science Europe       |[catalog][VWE]|       |2021-04|FDM Bayern eHumanities|
 
-Total: 31 catalogs, 15 views
+Total: 32 catalogs, 15 views
 
 [AKU]:         shared/ub_fau_erlangen_nuernberg/dfg-alte-kulturen/
 [CHE]:         shared/ub_fau_erlangen_nuernberg/dfg-chemie/
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ Total: 31 catalogs, 15 views
 [MAT]:         shared/MATH+
 [QAT]:         shared/Mathmet-QAT
 [EPM]:         shared/metrology-rdm/
+[UDA]:         shared/ulb_darmstadt/
 [Q-rdmo]:      rdmorganiser/questions/questions-rdmo.xml
 [Q-fhp]:       rdmorganiser/questions/questions-fhpshort.xml
 [Q-dcc]:       rdmorganiser/questions/questions-dcc.xml
@@ -155,3 +157,6 @@ Total: 31 catalogs, 15 views
 [V-dmptool]:   rdmorganiser/views/view-dmptool.xml
 [V-h2020]:     rdmorganiser/views/view-horizon2020.xml
 [V-varcheck]:  rdmorganiser/views/view-variable_check.xml
+[V-dmptool]:   rdmorganiser/views/view-dmptool.xml
+[V-h2020]:     rdmorganiser/views/view-horizon2020.xml
+[V-varcheck]:  rdmorganiser/views/view-variable_check.xml
diff --git a/...4Culture/Katalog für Softwareanbieter.xml → ...NFDI4Culture/collection_software_provider b/...4Culture/Katalog für Softwareanbieter.xml → ...NFDI4Culture/collection_software_provider
@@ -6,9 +6,11 @@
 		<dc:comment/>
 		<order>2</order>
 		<title lang="en">Criteria for evaluating collection management systems (CMS)</title>
-		<help lang="en"/>
+		<help lang="en">This questionnaire has been designed to enable providers of collection management systems (CMS) to describe their products in detail, making them comparable for user institutions. A separate questionnaire must be completed for each product offered by a provider, since the available options can vary significantly depending on the product type.
+All mandatory questions are marked with ***. These questions are necessary to ensure that the software products can be easily compared. Potential users of the software receive their own questionnaire on the features they consider important in a CMS. Based on these core criteria, various products from individual providers that are particularly well suited to their needs can be recommended to them. This facilitates a match between provider and customer.</help>
 		<title lang="de">Kriterien zur Evaluierung von Sammlungsmanagementsystemen (SMS)</title>
-		<help lang="de"/>
+		<help lang="de">Dieser Fragenkatalog wurde für Anbieter von Sammlungsmanagementsystemen (SMS) entwickelt, um ihre Produkte ausführlich zu beschreiben und für nutzende Einrichtungen vergleichbar zu machen. Pro Produkt eines Anbieters muss ein eigener Fragebogen ausgefüllt werden, weil die Optionen je nach Produktart stark voneinander abweichen können. Alle Pflichtfragen sind mit *** markiert. Diese sind notwendig, um eine gute Vergleichbarkeit der Softwareprodukte zu gewährleisten. 
+Mögliche Nutzer der Software erhalten einen eigenen Fragebogen zu Aspekten, die ihnen bei einem Sammlungsmanagementsystem (SMS) wichtig sind. Anhand der daraus abgeleiteten Kernkriterien können ihnen verschiedene Produkte einzelner Anbieter vorgeschlagen werden, die besonders gut zu ihren Bedarfen passen. Ein Matching zwischen Anbieter und Kunde wird auf diese Weise ermöglicht.</help>
 		<sections>
 			<section dc:uri="https://rdmo.nfdi4culture.de/terms/questions/anbieter" order="1"/>
 			<section dc:uri="https://rdmo.nfdi4culture.de/terms/questions/kunden" order="2"/>

diff --git a/...ure/Katalog für Museen und Sammlungen.xml → shared/NFDI4Culture/collection_software_user b/...ure/Katalog für Museen und Sammlungen.xml → shared/NFDI4Culture/collection_software_user
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
 Target/Actual analysis in preparation for the implementation of a digital collection management system (CMS)</dc:comment>
 		<order>1</order>
 		<title lang="en">Target/actual analysis for the selection of a collection management system (CMS)</title>
-		<help lang="en"/>
+		<help lang="en">A digital collection management system (CMS) is a specialised software solution designed to organise and present collections in cultural heritage institutions, such as museums, libraries and archives (GLAM). These systems facilitate the effective management of diverse collection items, including works of art and historical artefacts, by providing database-driven recording and public access to object information. Before selecting and implementing a digital CMS, institutions should clearly define their goals and available resources, as this is crucial in determining which system best suits their needs. Our questionnaire is designed from the user's perspective to help you clarify your requirements and select suitable software. It is not intended for external evaluation, but rather for internal reflection on and planning of digitisation projects within a cultural heritage institution. All mandatory questions are marked with ***. These are necessary to ensure the software products can be compared effectively.</help>
 		<title lang="de">Soll-Ist-Analyse für die Auswahl eines Sammlungsmanagementsystems (SMS)</title>
-		<help lang="de"/>
+		<help lang="de">Ein digitales Sammlungsmanagementsystem (SMS) ist eine spezialisierte Softwarelösung für die Organisation und Präsentation von Sammlungen in Institutionen des kulturellen Erbes wie Museen, Bibliotheken oder Archiven (GLAM). Diese Systeme ermöglichen die effiziente Verwaltung verschiedener Sammlungsobjekte, einschließlich Kunstwerken und historischen Artefakten, durch die datenbankgestützte Erfassung und öffentliche Zugänglichmachung von Objektinformationen. Vor der Auswahl und Implementierung eines digitalen SMS sollten Institutionen ihre Ziele und Ressourcen klar definieren, da dies entscheidend dafür ist, welches System am besten zu ihren Bedürfnissen passt. Unser Fragebogen ist aus Anwendersicht formuliert und kann zur Klärung der eigenen Anforderungen und zur Unterstützung bei der Auswahl geeigneter Software als Entscheidungshilfe dienen. Er ist nicht für externe Auswertungen gedacht, sondern dient der internen Reflexion und Planung von Digitalisierungsprojekten in einer Kulturerbe-Einrichtung. Alle Pflichtfragen sind mit *** markiert. Diese sind notwendig, um eine gute Vergleichbarkeit der Softwareprodukte zu gewährleisten.</help>
 		<sections>
 			<section dc:uri="https://rdmo.nfdi4culture.de/terms/questions/rahmen" order="1"/>
 			<section dc:uri="https://rdmo.nfdi4culture.de/terms/questions/ressourcen" order="2"/>

diff --git a/shared/NFDI4Culture/readme.txt b/shared/NFDI4Culture/readme.txt
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
 The catalogues help museums and collections to select the most suitable software for managing their collections. They complement each other in terms of their functions, covering the most important areas between them.
 
 About the templates:
-One template (Katalog für Museen und Sammlungen.xml) is designed from the user's perspective and helps clarify specific requirements and select the right software. It can be completed in preparation for a detailed consultation. Based on the answers provided, any special requirements can be identified and addressed.
+One template (collection_software_user.xml) is designed from the user's perspective and helps clarify specific requirements and select the right software. It can be completed in preparation for a detailed consultation. Based on the answers provided, any special requirements can be identified and addressed.
 
-The other template (Katalog für Softwareanbieter.xml) lists evaluation criteria and enables software products to be described in detail from the provider's perspective, making them comparable for user institutions. This facilitates a match between software providers and customers. Questions that are mandatory or core and must be answered to ensure comparability are marked with three asterisks (***). Both catalogues contain a large number of important questions with extensive selection options.
+The other template (collection_software_provider.xml) lists evaluation criteria and enables software products to be described in detail from the provider's perspective, making them comparable for user institutions. This facilitates a match between software providers and customers. Questions that are mandatory or core and must be answered to ensure comparability are marked with three asterisks (***). Both catalogues contain a large number of important questions with extensive selection options.
 
 The catalogues are available in German and English and can be accessed via https://rdmo.nfdi4culture.de/ (funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – project number 441958017). They were created as part of NFDI's basic service, DMP4NFDI. DMP4NFDI's main objective is to support NFDI consortia in developing and providing standardised data and software management plan services.