Skip to content

Conversation

@highskore
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@highskore highskore requested review from Copilot and kopy-kat July 21, 2025 08:41
@highskore highskore marked this pull request as draft July 21, 2025 08:42
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a new StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer module that enables multiple stateless validators to be used together in a single validation operation. The implementation allows for composition of different validator types (e.g., ECDSA and WebAuthn) where all validators must pass for the overall validation to succeed.

  • Implements a new multiplexer contract that validates signatures by calling multiple stateless validators
  • Adds comprehensive test coverage for various validation scenarios including edge cases
  • Updates Solidity version from 0.8.25 to 0.8.28 across the project

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
src/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer.sol Core multiplexer implementation with signature validation logic
test/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer.sol Comprehensive test suite covering success/failure scenarios
foundry.toml Updates Solidity compiler version to 0.8.28
.vscode/settings.json Configures VS Code to use Solidity 0.8.28
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

test/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer.sol:124

  • The test test_OnInstall only asserts assertTrue(true) which provides no meaningful validation. Consider testing actual behavior or state changes.
        assertTrue(true);

test/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer/StatelessValidatorMultiPlexer.sol:129

  • The test test_OnUninstall only asserts assertTrue(true) which provides no meaningful validation. Consider testing actual behavior or state changes.
        assertTrue(true);

@highskore highskore requested a review from kopy-kat July 22, 2025 08:45
@highskore highskore marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2025 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants