Skip to content

fix: remove changelog about unreleased tag - #135

Merged
rindrics merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix
Feb 13, 2026
Merged

fix: remove changelog about unreleased tag#135
rindrics merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix

Conversation

@rindrics

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Summary by Qodo

Remove unreleased v0.7.0 changelog entry

🐞 Bug fix

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Remove unreleased v0.7.0 changelog entry
• Revert incomplete changelog from previous PR attempt
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["CHANGELOG.md<br/>with v0.7.0 entry"] -- "Remove unreleased<br/>v0.7.0 section" --> B["CHANGELOG.md<br/>starting with v0.6.0"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. CHANGELOG.md 🐞 Bug fix +0/-6

Remove unreleased v0.7.0 changelog section

• Removed entire v0.7.0 changelog section (6 lines)
• Deleted unreleased version entry with 4 associated features/fixes
• Kept v0.6.0 and earlier versions intact

CHANGELOG.md


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Rindrics has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rindrics
rindrics merged commit e1e00c9 into main Feb 13, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
@rindrics
rindrics deleted the fix branch February 13, 2026 03:35
@rindrics rindrics mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 08c940b):

https://izuminokami-kanesada--pr135-fix-21x26fmi.web.app

(expires Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:36:51 GMT)

🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎

Sign: 4c4412227845b968bcb4c8b6996048cdd07fd6de

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider


Action required

1. Changelog/version mismatch 🐞 Bug ⛯ Reliability
Description
This PR removes the v0.7.0 section from CHANGELOG.md, leaving v0.6.0 as the latest entry while
package.json still declares version 0.7.0. This inconsistency can confuse users and may lead to
missing/incorrect release notes since tagpr is configured to source the release version from
package.json.
Code

CHANGELOG.md[R1-5]

# Changelog

-## [v0.7.0](https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/compare/v0.6.0...v0.7.0) - 2026-02-12
-- feat: provide copy button by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/126
-- fix: improve appearance of prev/next button by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/131
-- feat: provide collection functionality by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/128
-- feat: add lunyu contents by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/130
-
## [v0.6.0](https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/compare/v0.5.0...v0.6.0) - 2026-02-06
- feat: improve nav UI by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/120
- feat(mcp): improve content generation workflow with MCP by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/122
Evidence
CHANGELOG.md now starts with v0.6.0 as the latest entry, while package.json declares version 0.7.0;
additionally, tagpr is configured to read the version from package.json, so the release/tag version
source is now out of sync with the changelog.

CHANGELOG.md[1-5]
package.json[1-6]
.tagpr[4-8]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`CHANGELOG.md` no longer includes an entry for `v0.7.0`, but `package.json` still declares version `0.7.0`. Since tagpr is configured to read the release version from `package.json`, this can create release/tag events without matching changelog notes and causes user-facing confusion.

### Issue Context
This PR explicitly removes the `v0.7.0` changelog entry (“unreleased tag”), but it does not adjust the declared version.

### Fix Focus Areas
- CHANGELOG.md[1-5]
- package.json[1-6]
- .tagpr[4-8]

### Suggested fix approaches
1) Re-add a `v0.7.0` section (or move those bullets under an `Unreleased` section) so the changelog reflects the declared version, **or**
2) If `v0.7.0` is not released yet, revert `package.json` to `0.6.0` (or use a pre-release version) until the release is actually cut.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


Grey Divider

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
Comment on lines 1 to 5
# Changelog

## [v0.7.0](https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/compare/v0.6.0...v0.7.0) - 2026-02-12
- feat: provide copy button by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/126
- fix: improve appearance of prev/next button by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/131
- feat: provide collection functionality by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/128
- feat: add lunyu contents by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/130

## [v0.6.0](https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/compare/v0.5.0...v0.6.0) - 2026-02-06
- feat: improve nav UI by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/120
- feat(mcp): improve content generation workflow with MCP by @Rindrics in https://github.com/Rindrics/izuminokami-kanesada/pull/122

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

1. Changelog/version mismatch 🐞 Bug ⛯ Reliability

This PR removes the v0.7.0 section from CHANGELOG.md, leaving v0.6.0 as the latest entry while
package.json still declares version 0.7.0. This inconsistency can confuse users and may lead to
missing/incorrect release notes since tagpr is configured to source the release version from
package.json.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
`CHANGELOG.md` no longer includes an entry for `v0.7.0`, but `package.json` still declares version `0.7.0`. Since tagpr is configured to read the release version from `package.json`, this can create release/tag events without matching changelog notes and causes user-facing confusion.

### Issue Context
This PR explicitly removes the `v0.7.0` changelog entry (“unreleased tag”), but it does not adjust the declared version.

### Fix Focus Areas
- CHANGELOG.md[1-5]
- package.json[1-6]
- .tagpr[4-8]

### Suggested fix approaches
1) Re-add a `v0.7.0` section (or move those bullets under an `Unreleased` section) so the changelog reflects the declared version, **or**
2) If `v0.7.0` is not released yet, revert `package.json` to `0.6.0` (or use a pre-release version) until the release is actually cut.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant