Update calculator.py #35
Conversation
|
On it! Codecov is generating unit tests for this PR. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
PR DescriptionThis pull request introduces new multiplication functions to the Click to see moreKey Technical ChangesThe key technical changes include: 1) Modification of the Architecture DecisionsNo significant architectural decisions are apparent. The changes involve adding new static methods to an existing class. The lack of clear naming conventions and the duplication of logic might indicate a need for better design considerations. Dependencies and InteractionsThese changes are isolated to the Risk ConsiderationsThe primary risks include: 1) Breaking existing functionality due to the modification of Notable Implementation DetailsThe addition of a constant offset in |
| def multiplyBy62(x, y): | ||
| return x * y * 12412 + 213 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The modification to multiplyBy62 changes its behavior by adding 213 to the result. This is a breaking change that will cause existing tests to fail and may break dependent code. If this is intentional, consider renaming the function to reflect its new behavior (e.g., multiplyBy62WithOffset) or create a new function instead.
| def multiplyBy62(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 + 213 | |
| def multiplyBy62WithOffset(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 + 213 |
Helpful? 👍 👎
| def multiplyBy622(x, y): | ||
| return x * y * 12412 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function name multiplyBy622 is inconsistent with the multiplication factor used (12412). The name suggests it should multiply by 622, but it multiplies by 12412. Consider renaming to reflect the actual operation or fix the multiplication factor.
| def multiplyBy622(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 | |
| def multiplyBy12412(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 |
Helpful? 👍 👎
| print("delete") | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The print statement on line 31 is unreachable code because it comes after a return statement. This will never execute and should be removed. Additionally, the comment 'delete' suggests this code was meant to be removed.
| print("delete") | |
| def multiplyBy623(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 |
Helpful? 👍 👎
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
PR DescriptionThis pull request introduces several new multiplication functions to the Click to see moreKey Technical ChangesThe key technical changes include:
Architecture DecisionsNo clear architectural decisions are evident. The changes seem ad-hoc and lack a cohesive design. The introduction of multiple similar functions without clear differentiation or purpose raises concerns about maintainability and code clarity. Dependencies and InteractionsThese changes primarily affect the Risk ConsiderationsThe primary risks include:
Notable Implementation DetailsThe most notable implementation detail is the presence of unreachable code in the |
| def multiplyBy62(x, y): | ||
| return x * y * 12412 + 213 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The modification to this function changes its behavior by adding 213 to the result. This appears to be an unintentional change that breaks the function's original purpose. If this change is intentional, please update the function name to reflect its new behavior and add documentation explaining the purpose of the constant 213.
| def multiplyBy62(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 + 213 | |
| def multiplyBy62(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 |
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews
| def multiplyBy622(x, y): | ||
| return x * y * 12412 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This new function multiplyBy622 appears to duplicate the original behavior of multiplyBy62. Consider if this duplication is necessary. If both functions are needed, please provide more descriptive names that clearly indicate their different purposes.
| def multiplyBy622(x, y): | |
| return x * y * 12412 | |
| def multiplyBy622(x, y): | |
| """Multiply x and y by 12412.""" | |
| return x * y * 12412 |
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds automated-review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
@sentry review |
1 similar comment
|
@sentry review |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
Seer failed to run. |
|
@sentry review |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
Seer failed to run. |
|
@sentry review |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
|
On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly. |
|
🚧 Skipped: PR exceeds review size limit. Please split into smaller PRs and re-run. |
No description provided.