Skip to content

Conversation

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

@codecov-ai-reviewer review

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

@sentry review

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

@sentry review

@rohitvinnakota-codecov
Copy link
Owner Author

@codecov-ai-reviewer review

@codecov-ai

This comment has been minimized.

Comment on lines +23 to +25


def multiplyBy622(x, y):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code duplication detected: The new function multiplyBy622 has identical logic to the existing multiplyBy62 function (both return x * y * 12412). This violates the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle. Either remove the duplicate function or, if intended, refactor to eliminate code duplication using a shared implementation or by removing one of them.

Suggested change
def multiplyBy622(x, y):
# Remove this duplicate function and use multiplyBy62 instead, or clarify the intended purpose if it should be different.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Comment on lines +24 to +26

def multiplyBy622(x, y):
return x * y * 12412

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function is a duplicate of multiplyBy62 with identical logic. Code duplication makes maintenance harder and increases the risk of bugs. Consider either removing this function if it's not needed, or if both functions serve different purposes, clarify their distinct responsibilities with proper documentation and meaningful names.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Comment on lines +24 to +25

def multiplyBy622(x, y):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The function name multiplyBy622 is misleading. The function multiplies by 12412, not 622. Function names should accurately reflect what they do. Consider renaming to something like multiplyBy12412 or extracting the magic number to a named constant with a descriptive name that explains the significance of 12412.

Suggested change
def multiplyBy622(x, y):
# If the constant has a specific meaning, define it at module level:
# MULTIPLICATION_FACTOR = 12412
def multiply_by_factor(x, y):
"""Multiply two numbers by a predefined factor.
Args:
x: First number
y: Second number
Returns:
x * y * MULTIPLICATION_FACTOR
"""
return x * y * MULTIPLICATION_FACTOR

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants